Rad v IAC/InterActiveCorp

Annotate this Case
Download PDF
Rad v IAC/InterActiveCorp 2022 NY Slip Op 33170(U) September 20, 2022 Supreme Court, New York County Docket Number: Index No. 654038/2018 Judge: Joel M. Cohen Cases posted with a "30000" identifier, i.e., 2013 NY Slip Op 30001(U), are republished from various New York State and local government sources, including the New York State Unified Court System's eCourts Service. This opinion is uncorrected and not selected for official publication. INDEX NO. 654038/2018 [FILED: NEW YORK COUNTY CLERK 09/20/2022 04:42 P~ NYSCEF DOC. NO. 2768 RECEIVED NYSCEF: 09/20/2022 SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK COUNTY OF NEW YORK: COMMERCIAL DIVISION PART 03M ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------- X SEAN RAD, PAUL CAFARDO, GARETH JOHNSON, ALEXA MATEEN, JUSTIN MATEEN, RYAN OGLE, Plaintiffs, - V - IAC/INTERACTIVECORP, MATCH GROUP, INC., MATCH GROUP, LLC, INDEX NO. 654038/2018 MOTION DATE N/A MOTION SEQ. NO. 054 DECISION+ ORDER ON MOTION Defendants. ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------- X HON. JOEL M. COHEN: The following e-filed documents, listed by NYSCEF document number (Motion 054) 1022, 1871, 1872, 1873, 1873, 1874, 1876, 1877, 1878, 1879, 1881, 1882, 1883, 1884, 1887, 1892, 1893, 1894,1904, 1909, 1910, 1911, 1912, 1913, 1914, 1924, 1932, 1934, 1940, 1942, 1945, 1946, 1947, 1948, 1949, 1965, 1980, 1982, 1985, 2006, 2014, 2016, 2022, 2027, 2035, 2038, 2059, 2064, 2071, 2353, 2354, 2356, 2357, 2358, 2359, 2362, 2363, 2376, 2377, 2378, 2380, 2396, 2397, 2405, 2406, 2408, 2409, 2432, 2438, 2448, 2468, 2469, 2470, 2471, 2472, 2473, 2474, 2475, 2476, 2477, 2478, 2560, 2565, 2618 SEAL were read on this motion to Defendants IAC/InterActiveCorp, Match Group, Inc., and Match Group, LLC ("Defendants") move for an order sealing and/or redacting certain documents filed in connection with the parties' pre-trial motions in limine (Mot. Seq. Nos. 044-053). 1 For the following reasons, the motion is granted in part. Motion Sequences 19, 20, 23, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 35, 36, 37, 38, 39, 41, 42, 43, 54, 55, 56, 57, 58, and 64 initially were referred to the Hon. Eileen Bransten (the "JHO") (see NYSCEF 1803, 2611) but were not finally resolved prior to her unfortunate passing. A jury trial was held in November 2021 resulting in a settlement among the parties. At the Court's request, the parties filed a joint letter identifying documents subject to their respective sealing motions that were admitted at trial and withdrawing certain requests to seal (see NYSCEF 2736 and attached exhibits). 1 654038/2018 RAD, SEAN vs. IAC/INTERACTIVECORP Motion No. 054 [* 1] Page 1 of4 1 of 4 [FILED: NEW YORK COUNTY CLERK 09/20/2022 04:42 P~ NYSCEF DOC. NO. 2768 INDEX NO. 654038/2018 RECEIVED NYSCEF: 09/20/2022 Pursuant to§ 216.1 (a) of the Uniform Rules for Trial Courts, this Court may seal a filing "upon a written finding of good cause, which shall specify the grounds thereof. In determining whether good cause has been shown, the court shall consider the interests of the public as well as of the parties" (22 NYCRR § 216.1 [a]). The Appellate Division has emphasized that "there is a broad presumption that the public is entitled to access to judicial proceedings and court records" (Mosallem v Berenson, 76 AD3d 345, 348 [1st Dept 2010]). "Since the right [of public access to court proceedings] is of constitutional dimension, any order denying access must be narrowly tailored to serve compelling objectives, such as a need for secrecy that outweighs the public's right to access" (Danco Labs., Ltd v Chemical Works of Gedeon Richter, Ltd, 274 AD2d 1, 6 [1st Dept 2000] [emphasis added]; see also, e.g. Gryphon Dom. VI, LLC v APP Intern. Fin. Co., B. V, 28 AD3d 322, 324 [1st Dept 2006]). "Furthermore, because confidentiality is the exception and not the rule, 'the party seeking to seal court records has the burden to demonstrate compelling circumstances to justify restricting public access"' (Maxim, Inc. v Feifer, 145 AD3d 516, 517 [1st Dept 2016] [citations omitted]). The parties have identified documents subject to their respective sealing motions that were admitted at trial and withdrawing certain requests to seal (see NYSCEF 2736 and attached exhibits). As relevant here, Defendants withdrew their request to redact/seal NYSCEF Doc. Nos. 1881, 1887, 1909, 1910, 1940, 1942, 1946, 2038, and 2378. The Court has reviewed the remaining documents subject to this sealing motion and finds that they comport with the applicable sealing standards as laid out in Mosallem, 76 AD3d at 348-50, and its progeny, in that they contain sensitive non-public financial information of Match and its subsidiaries (NYSCEF 1871, 1872, 1873, 1874, 1876, 1877, 1878, 1879, 1882, 1883, 1892, 1893, 1894, 1904, 1912, 654038/2018 RAD, SEAN vs. IAC/INTERACTIVECORP Motion No. 054 [* 2] Page 2 of 4 2 of 4 [FILED: NEW YORK COUNTY CLERK 09/20/2022 04:42 P~ NYSCEF DOC. NO. 2768 INDEX NO. 654038/2018 RECEIVED NYSCEF: 09/20/2022 1913, 1932, 1934, 1945, 1947, 1948, 1949, 1985,2006,2022,2035,2059,2353,2354,2356, 2357, 2358, 2359, 2362, 2363, 2376, 2380, 2405, 2406, 2408, 2409, 2431, and 2448), Tinder's Marketing and Business Initiatives and Strategies (NYSCEF 1914, 1965, 1980, 2006, 2014, 2026, 2027, 2064, 2353, 2356, 2380, and 2397), Tinder's Product Performance Metrics and Product Development Strategies and Engineering (NYSCEF 1883, 1884, 1887, 1911, 2071, 2377, 2380, and 2438), and Tinder's Relationships with Key Counter-Parties (NYSCEF 1924, 1932, 1980, and 2014). The Court also finds good cause to seal and/or redact documents that relate to the 2016 Tinder Holiday Party (NYSCEF 1980, 1982, 2022, and 2396) as this information was excluded from trial on the grounds that it is irrelevant and unduly prejudicial to Defendants (see NYSCEF 1308). Finally, the Court notes that certain documents were filed under seal, but no party moved to seal and/or redact those documents. Accordingly, the Court will direct the County Clerk to unseal those documents. Accordingly, it is ORDERED that Defendants' motion is granted; and it is further ORDERED that the County Clerk shall maintain NYSCEF Document Numbers 1022, 1871, 1872, 1873, 1873, 1874, 1876, 1877, 1878, 1879, 1882, 1883, 1884, 1892, 1893, 1894, 1904, 1911, 1912, 1913, 1914, 1924, 1932, 1934, 1945, 1947, 1948, 1949, 1965, 1980, 1982, 1985,2006,2014,2016,2022,2027,2035,2059,2064,2071,2353,2354,2356,2357,2358, 2359,2362,2363,2376,2377,2380,2396,2397,2405,2406,2408,2409,2432,2438,2448, 2473, 2474, 2475, 2476, and 2477 under seal, so that the documents may only be accessible by the parties, their counsel, and authorized court personnel; it is further 654038/2018 RAD, SEAN vs. IAC/INTERACTIVECORP Motion No. 054 [* 3] Page 3 of 4 3 of 4 INDEX NO. 654038/2018 !FILED: NEW YORK COUNTY CLERK 09/20/2022 04 :42 PM! NYSCEF DOC. NO. 2768 RECEIVED NYSCEF: 09/20/2022 ORDERED that the County Clerk unseal NYSCEF Doc. Nos. 1881, 1887, 1909, 1910, 1940, 1942, 1946, 2038, and 2378; and it is further ORDERED that the County Clerk unseal NYSCEF Doc. Nos. 1964, 1974, 1975, 1976, 1977, 1978, 1979, 1983, 1984, 1986, 1987, 1988, 1989, 1990, 1991, 1992, 1993,2007,2008, 2009,2011,2013,2017,2018,2019,2020,2021,2023,2024,2025,2028,2065,2066,2341, 2068,2070,2072,2073,2074,2075,2076,2077,2078,2079,2329,2346,2393,2394,2395, 2398, 2399, 2400, 2402, 2402, 2441, 2442, 2449, 2450, and 2451, as they are not covered by any sealing motion. This constitutes the Decision and Order of the Court. 9/20/2022 DATE CHECK ONE: JOEL M. COHEN, J.S.C. CASE DISPOSED GRANTED • NON-FINAL DISPOSITION DENIED SETTLE ORDER SUBMIT ORDER CHECK IF APPROPRIATE: INCLUDES TRANSFER/REASSIGN FIDUCIARY APPOINTMENT 654038/2018 RAD, SEAN vs. IAC/INTERACTIVECORP Motion No. 054 [* 4] GRANTED IN PART APPLICATION: • • OTHER REFERENCE Page 4 of 4 4 of 4

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.