Sciarrino v Kateri Residence

Annotate this Case

Download PDF

Sciarrino v Kateri Residence 2021 NY Slip Op 33023(U) December 3, 2021 Supeme Court, Bronx County Docket Number: Index No. 20474/2015E Judge: Jr., Kenneth L. Thompson Cases posted with a "30000" identifier, i.e., 2013 NY Slip Op 30001(U), are republished from various New York State and local government sources, including the New York State Unified Court System's eCourts Service. This opinion is uncorrected and not selected for official publication. [*FILED: 1] BRONX COUNTY CLERK 12/13/2021 11:56 AM INDEX NO. 20474/2015E NYSCEF DOC. NO. 137 RECEIVED NYSCEF: 12/13/2021 EW YORK SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF COUNTY OF BRONX IA 20 X UMBERTO SCIARRINO , Index o: 20474/2015E Plaintiff, -agai nst- DECISIO KATERI RESIDE CE and ARCHCARE AT KA TERI RESIDENCE , Defendants - - -- - - - - -- - - A D ORDER Present: HON. KEN ETH L. THOMPSO , JR. ~ - -- - X The following papers numbered I to read on thi s motion for summary judgment PAPERS On Calendar of Jul y IS, 2021 No #2 NYSCEF sequence tion nexed--------mo An ts Affidavi and Exhibits Cause Notice of Motion-Order to Show NY CE f #2 ce en u cq ----------motion ------------------------------------ibits-------Exh and davit ffi Answering A Replying Affidavit and Exh ibi ts------------------------------------------------------------m otion seq ucncc #2 NYSC E F Upon the foregoing papers and due de liberati on thereof, th e Decisi on/Order on th is motion is as follows : Plaintiff moves pursuant to CPLR 3212 for summary judgment on liability on the statutory PHL 2801-d claim against defendants as a discovery and spoliation sanction for failing to prese rve and disclose statutorily required clinical records, to strike defendants answer as a spoliation sanction and on the claim against defendants based upon defendant's " inability to plead and prove it exercised all care reasonably necessary to prevent and limit the deprivation and injury" to plaintiff. Defendants ' cross-motio n was denied in an order dated July 14, 2021 of Justice Julia I. Rodriguez. This action arose as a result of personal injuries sustained by plaintiff in a nursing home owned by defendants. A party who seeks sanctions for spoliation of evidence must show that the party having control over the evidence possessed an obligation to preserve it when it was destroyed, the evidence was destroyed with a "culpable state of mind ," and "the destroyed evidence was relevant to the party's claim or defense such that the 1 of 4 C [*FILED: 2] BRONX COUNTY CLERK 12/13/2021 11:56 AM NYSCEF DOC. NO. 137 INDEX NO. 20474/2015E RECEIVED NYSCEF: 12/13/2021 trier of fact could find that the evidence would support that claim or defense." (China Dev. Indus. Bank v. Morgan Stanley & Co. Inc., 183 A.D.3d 504, 505 [l st Dept 2020]). Plaintiff has not established that the evidence he seeks was destroyed with a "culpable state of mind ." Therefore, spoliation sanctions are denied. "To obtain summary judgment it is necessary that the movant establish [a] cause of action or defense sufficiently to warrant the court as a matter of law in directing judgment in [movant's] favor [CPLR 3212, subd. (B)] , and [movant] must do so by tender of proof in admissible form" (Friends of Animals v. Assa. Fur Mfrs. , 46 NY2d 1065, l 067 [ 1979]). Plaintiffs motion predicated upon is on New York Public Health Law § 2801- D. Section 2801-D provides a right of recovery from "[a]ny residential health care facility that deprives any patient of said facility of any right or benefit, as hereinafter defined, shall be liable to said patient for injuries suffered as a result of said deprivation ... a 'right or benefit' of a patient of a residential health care facility shall mean any right or benefit created or established for the well-being of the patient by the terms of any contract, by any state statute, code , rule or regulation or by any applicable federal statute, code, rule or regulation." Plaintiff was discharged from Kateri Residence August 17, 2013 and the nursing home was sold to The Riverside Premier Rehabilitation and Healing Center, (Riverside), on August 28 , 2013. Defendants have submitted an affidavit from Annmarie Covone, (Covone), dated June 2, 2021, Executive Vice 2 2 of 4 ., [*FILED: 3] BRONX COUNTY CLERK 12/13/2021 11:56 AM NYSCEF DOC. NO. 137 INDEX NO. 20474/2015E RECEIVED NYSCEF: 12/13/2021 President/Chief Financial Officer of defendant, Arch Care at Kateri Residence. Covone avers that "(a)s part of the sale, the incident reports, policies and procedures and administration manuals were all transferred to Riverside. The above lawsuit against Kateri Residence was not commenced until 2015, about two years after the sale." Defendants' attorney has suggested that plaintiff serve a subpoena upon Riverside for those sought after documents. With respect to the production of plaintiff's clinical records, l ONYCRR § 415.22(£) describes what shall be contained in the records: (f) The clinical record shall contain: ( 1) sufficient information to identify the resident. (2) a record of the resident's comprehensive assessments; (3) the plan of care and services provided; ( 4) the results of any preadmission screening conducted by the State; (5) progress notes by all practitioners and professional staff caring for the resident; and (6) reports of all diagnostic tests and results of treatments and procedures ordered for the resident. There is no language in the regulation that mandates documents such as Incident Reports or Policy and Procedure manuals be maintained in the clinical records . Plaintiff has not provided any evidence of a lack of any required documents in the clinical records that have been produced by defendants. With respect to that branch of plaintiffs motion that seeks summary judgment for defendant's "inability to plead and prove it exercised all care reasonably necessary to prevent and limit the deprivation and injury" to plaintiff, the burden on this motion, plaintiff's motion, and at trial is initially upon plaintiff. The aforesaid branch of plaintiff's motion misplaces the burden on this motion 3 3 of 4 [*FILED: 4] BRONX COUNTY CLERK 12/13/2021 11:56 AM NYSCEF DOC. NO. 137 INDEX NO. 20474/2015E RECEIVED NYSCEF: 12/13/2021 upon defendant. Moreover, the affidavit of plaintiffs e~pert is conclusory. (Cortez v. Terrence Cardinal Cooke Health Ctr., No. 14580, 2021 WL 5182866, at * 1 [1 st Dept 2021 ]). Accordingly , plaintiffs motion is denied without prejudice to plaintiffs ability to move for an adverse inference charge at trial. (Handw erker v. City of New York, 90 A.D.3d 409 [l st Dept 2011 ). The foregoing constitutes the decision and order of the Court. Dated: / t/4(2°l-t f I 4 4 of 4

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.