Area ID, Inc. v Elizabeth Stone LLC

Annotate this Case

Download PDF

Area ID, Inc. v Elizabeth Stone LLC 2021 NY Slip Op 30060(U) January 7, 2021 Supreme Court, New York County Docket Number: 650993/2015 Judge: Shawn T. Kelly Cases posted with a "30000" identifier, i.e., 2013 NY Slip Op 30001(U), are republished from various New York State and local government sources, including the New York State Unified Court System's eCourts Service. This opinion is uncorrected and not selected for official publication. [*FILED: 1] NEW YORK COUNTY CLERK 01/08/2021 02:01 PM NYSCEF DOC. NO. 176 INDEX NO. 650993/2015 RECEIVED NYSCEF: 01/08/2021 SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK COUNTY OF NEW YORK: PART IAS MOTION 57 -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------X AREA. .. ID, INC., INGA DAVIDSSON, INDEX NO. 650993/2015 Plaintiff, MOTION DATE 11/09/2020 -vELIZABETH STONE LLC, STONE STREET PROPERTIES LLC, ROBERT MORGENSTERN, JEFFREY KAYE, ALISSA HAZAN, 260 ELIZABETH STREET OWNERS LLC, BERNARDINI BROTHERS LANDSCAPING, LLC, Defendant. MOTION SEQ. NO. 003 DECISION+ ORDER ON MOTION -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------X ELIZABETH STONE LLC, STONE STREET PROPERTIES LLC, ROBERT MORGENSTERN, JEFFREY KAYE, ALISSA HAZAN Third-Party Index No. 595077/2019 Plaintiff, -against- Defendant. --------------------------------------------------------------------------------X ELIZABETH STONE LLC, STONE STREET PROPERTIES LLC, ROBERT MORGENSTERN, ALISSA HAZAN Second Third-Party Index No. 595068/2020 Plaintiff, -againstBERNARDINI BUILDERS ENTERPRISES, INC., ALBA CARTING & DEMOLITION, INC. Defendant. --------------------------------------------------------------------------------X HON. SHAWN TIMOTHY KELLY: The following e-filed documents, listed by NYSCEF document number (Motion 003) 120, 121 , 122, 123, 124, 125, 126, 127, 128, 129,134, 135, 136, 137, 138, 146, 147, 148, 149 were read on this motion to/for AMEND CAPTION/PLEADINGS Upon the foregoing documents, it is 650993/2015 AREA ... ID, INC. vs. ELIZABETH STONE LLC Motion No. 003 1 of 5 Page 1of5 [*FILED: 2] NEW YORK COUNTY CLERK 01/08/2021 02:01 PM NYSCEF DOC. NO. 176 INDEX NO. 650993/2015 RECEIVED NYSCEF: 01/08/2021 Plaintiffs Area ... ID Inc., and Inga Davidsson (herein "plaintiffs") move to amend the pleadings to add Bernardini Builders Enterprises, Inc. and Alba Carting & Demolition, Inc. (herein "Alba") as a Defendants to Action # 1. The parties have executed a stipulation, filed November 10, 2020, to amend the caption to add Bernardini Builders Enterprises, Inc. as a direct defendant in Action #1. Accordingly, this decision will solely address the issue of amending the caption to include Alba Carting & Demolition as a direct defendant in Action #1. In opposition, Alba contends that the statute of limitations has long expired and plaintiffs have not met the requirements permitting amendment based upon the relation-back doctrine. Alba alleges that it had no notice of the present lawsuit until February 2020, five years after the commencement of the lawsuit and seven years after the underlying events occurred. Background Area ID Inc., which is owned by Inga Davidsson, was the tenant of a commercial space located at 262 Elizabeth Street (herein "Subject Premises"). From January 2013 to March 2015, the subject premises underwent a series of renovations to the residential units above plaintiffs' leased space. The owner of the subject premises during the renovations was Elizabeth Stone LLC, which is itself owned/operated by Stone Street Properties LLC. Plaintiffs allege that during these renovations, they were the victim of a series ofnegligent acts that caused plaintiffs to suffer a loss of use of their premises, personal injuries, harassment, and damages to merchandise. On or about March 27, 2015, plaintiffs commenced the within action against Defendants Elizabeth Stone LLC, Stone Street Properties LLC, Robert Morgentstern, Jeffrey Kaye, Alissa Hazan and 260 Elizabeth Street Owner LLC, for the damages sustained as described above. On or aboutJanuary 25, 2019, a third-party action was commenced by Elizabeth Stone LLC, Stone Street Properties LLC, Robert Morgentstern, Jeffrey Kaye and, Alissa Hazan as against 650993/2015 AREA ... ID, INC. vs. ELIZABETH STONE LLC Motion No. 003 2 of 5 Page 2 of 5 [*FILED: 3] NEW YORK COUNTY CLERK 01/08/2021 02:01 PM NYSCEF DOC. NO. 176 INDEX NO. 650993/2015 RECEIVED NYSCEF: 01/08/2021 Bemadini Brothers Landscaping, LLC, in which it was alleged that Bemadini Brothers Landscaping was the contractor responsible for the work that caused plaintiffs' damages. On June 3, 2019, plaintiffs amended their Summons & Complaint to assert a direct cause of action against Bemadini Brothers Landscaping. On or about October 16, 2019, a second third-party action was commenced by Bemadini Brothers Landscaping, as against Alba Carting & Demolition, Inc. (herein "Alba"), in which it was alleged that Alba was a subcontractor of Bemadini Brothers Landscaping and was the entity responsible for the damages sustained by plaintiffs. In the Second Third-Party Complaint Bemadini Brothers Landscaping asserted that it entered into an agreement with Alba "to perform certain work at the aforesaid premises," and that pursuant to said agreement Alba was/is required to hold harmless and indemnify Bemadini Brothers Landscaping for the damages alleged by plaintiffs herein. On or about January 8, 2020, David Bemardindi, the owner of Bemadini Brothers Landscaping was deposed. Prior to the deposition, Bemadini Brothers Landscaping produced documents which included a bill to Bemadini Builders Enterprises from Alba. Plaintiffs contend that this bill was the first discovery of the entities Bemadini Builders Enterprises and Alba's involvement. On or about January 21, 2020, a 3rd third-party action was commenced by Elizabeth Stone LLC, Stone Street Properties LLC, Robert Morgentstem, Jeffrey Kaye, Alissa Hazan as against Bemadini Builders Enterprises, Inc. and Alba Carting & Demolition, Inc. for the damages sustained by plaintiffs. Analysis Pursuant to CPLR § 305(c), the Court, at its discretion, may allow a summons to be amended, but only if a substantial right of a party against whom the summons issued is not 650993/2015 AREA ... ID, INC. vs. ELIZABETH STONE LLC Motion No. 003 3 of 5 Page 3 of 5 [*FILED: 4] NEW YORK COUNTY CLERK 01/08/2021 02:01 PM NYSCEF DOC. NO. 176 INDEX NO. 650993/2015 RECEIVED NYSCEF: 01/08/2021 prejudiced. Plaintiffs contend that pursuant to the relation back doctrine, Alba cannot assert that the statute of limitations bars its inclusion as a direct defendant. In opposition, Alba argues that the relation back doctrine does not apply, and that plaintiffs' claims are completely barred under the statute of limitations. In order for a claim asserted against a new defendant to relate back to the date a claim was asserted against another defendant, the plaintiff must establish that (1) both claims arose out of the same conduct, transaction, or occurrence, (2) the new party is united in interest with the original defendant, and by reason of that relationship, can be charged with notice of the institution of the action and will not be prejudiced in maintaining his or her defense on the merits by virtue of the delayed, and otherwise stale, assertion of those claims against him or her, and (3) the new party knew or should have known that, but for a mistake by the plaintiff as to the identity of the proper parties, the action would have been timely commenced against him or her as well (see Alvarado v Beth Israel Med Ctr., 60 AD3d 981, 982, 876 NYS2d 147 [2009]; Buran v Coupal, 87 NY2d 173, 178 [1995]; Schiavone v Victory Mem. Hosp., 292 AD2d 365, 365-366 [2002]). Of paramount consideration is whether the new defendant had notice within the applicable limitations period (see Buran v Coupal, 87 NY2d at 180; Shapiro v Good Samaritan Regional Hosp. Med Ctr., 42 AD3d 443, 444 [2007]). Plaintiffs contend that adding Alba as a direct defendant would result in no prejudice as Alba has already repeatedly been named as a third-party defendant. However, plaintiffs do not address the significant differences in the causes of actions asserted against Alba in the third party complaints and those raised by plaintiffs in the direct action, mainly claims of negligence, trespass, constructive eviction, nuisance, nuisance per se, intentional infliction of emotional distress, tortuous interference with contract, and unspecified statutory violations. Further, 650993/2015 AREA ... ID, INC. vs. ELIZABETH STONE LLC Motion No. 003 4 of 5 Page 4 of 5 [*FILED: 5] NEW YORK COUNTY CLERK 01/08/2021 02:01 PM NYSCEF DOC. NO. 176 INDEX NO. 650993/2015 RECEIVED NYSCEF: 01/08/2021 plaintiffs have not demonstrated that Alba had notice of these claims nor that it is united in interest with the previously named defendants. Accordingly, plaintiffs' motion to amend the complaint to add Alba as a direct defendant is denied. It is hereby, ORDERED that plaintiffs motion to amend the complaint to add Alba Carting & Demolition, Inc., as a direct defendant is denied. ~OTHY 1/7/2021 DATE CHECK ONE: APPLICATION: CHECK IF APPROPRIATE: ~ CASE DISPOSED GRANTED NON-FINAL DISPOSITION 0 DENIED GRANTED IN PART SETTLE ORDER SUBMIT ORDER INCLUDES TRANSFER/REASSIGN FIDUCIARY APPOINTMENT 650993/2015 AREA ... ID, INC. vs. ELIZABETH STONE LLC Motion No. 003 5 of 5 KELLY, J.S.C. D D OTHER REFERENCE Page 5 of 5

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.