People v McTerrell

Annotate this Case
[*1] People v McTerrell 2020 NY Slip Op 50037(U) Decided on January 15, 2020 Supreme Court, Kings County Shillingford, J. Published by New York State Law Reporting Bureau pursuant to Judiciary Law § 431. This opinion is uncorrected and will not be published in the printed Official Reports.

Decided on January 15, 2020
Supreme Court, Kings County

The People of the State of New York

against

Sean McTerrell, Defendant.



903/2014



Sean McTerrell- Pro Se

Kings County District Attorney Eric Gonzalez:

By: Diane R. Eisner, Esquire

350 Jay Street

Brooklyn, NY 11201
Ruth Shillingford, J.

Mr. McTerrell, pro se, moves pursuant to CPL § 420.40 for a financial hardship hearing deferring the mandatary surcharge imposed upon his sentence to 12 years of incarceration plus 5 years post-release supervision, entered on or about June 25, 2015 (Firetog, J.), following his plea of guilty to Assault in the First Degree (PL §120.10[1]).[FN1]



Appellate Division, 2nd Department 45 Monroe Place Brooklyn, NY 11201

Kings County Supreme Court Criminal Appeals 320 Jay Street Brooklyn, NY 11201

Kings County District Attorney Appeals Bureau 350 Jay Street

Brooklyn, NY 11201 Footnotes

Footnote 1:On or about March 27, 2017, the Court (Firetog, J.) denied Mr. McTerrell's first pro se pro forma motion requesting waiver or deferral of the mandatory surcharges imposed on him at the time of sentencing. The People oppose the motion. For the reasons that follow, Mr. McTerrell's motion is denied.

Mr. McTerrell "has offered no credible and verifiable information establishing that the surcharge would work an unreasonable hardship on defendant over and above the ordinary hardship suffered by other indigent inmates" (People v Kistner, 291 AD2d 856 [4th Dept 2002], quoting People v Abdus-Samad, 274 AD2d 666, 667 [3d Dept 2000], lv denied 95 NY2d 862 [2000]; see CPL 420.40 [2]; see also People v Jones, 26 NY3d 730 [2016]; see generallyPeople v Nater, 65 Misc 3d 927 [Sup Ct, Bronx County 2019, Lewis, J.]). Nonetheless, the Court notes that perhaps the legislature may wish to consider paying inmates a wage less consistent with that paid by plantation owners to their slaves, so as to enable them to pay such surcharges. Accordingly, Mr. McTerrell's motion is denied, without a hearing.

This constitutes the Decision and Order of the Court.



Dated: Brooklyn, New York

_____________________

Ruth Shillingford, A.J.S.C.

Defendant is advised of his right to apply to the Appellate Division, Second Department, 45 Monroe Place, Brooklyn, NY 11201 for a certificate granting leave to appeal from this [*2]determination. This application must be made within 30 days of service of this decision. Upon proof of your financial inability to retain counsel and to pay the costs and expenses of the appeal, you may apply to the Appellate Division for the assignment of counsel and for leave to prosecute the appeal as a poor person and to dispense with printing. Application for poor person relief will be entertained only if and when permission to appeal or a certification granting leave to appeal is granted.[FN2] 22 NYCRR § 671.5 .



Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.