Dingle v Department of State - Div. of Licensing Servs.

Annotate this Case

Download PDF

Dingle v Department of State - Div. of Licensing Servs. 2019 NY Slip Op 33304(U) November 4, 2019 Supreme Court, New York County Docket Number: 158641/2018 Judge: Debra A. James Cases posted with a "30000" identifier, i.e., 2013 NY Slip Op 30001(U), are republished from various New York State and local government sources, including the New York State Unified Court System's eCourts Service. This opinion is uncorrected and not selected for official publication. [*FILED: 1] NEW YORK COUNTY CLERK 11/06/2019 02:26 PM INDEX NO. 158641/2018 NYSCEF DOC. NO. 31 RECEIVED NYSCEF: 11/06/2019 SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK NEW YORK COUNTY PRESENT: PART HON. DEBRA A. JAMES IAS MOTION 59EFM Justice ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------X INDEX NO. JAMEL DINGLE, 158641/2018 MOTION DATE Petitioner, 05/21/2019 00_1_ __ MOTION SEQ. NO. _ _ _ -vDEPARTMENT OF STATE - DIVISION OF LICENSING SERVICES, DECISION + ORDER ON MOTION Respondent. ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------X The following e-filed documents, listed by NYSCEF document number (Motion 001) 2, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19,20,21,22,23,24,25,26,27,28,29 were read on this motion to/for ARTICLE 78 (BODY OR OFFICER) ORDER Upon the foregoing documents, it is ADJUDGED that the petition to vacate and annul the determination of respondent New York State Division of Licensing Services, dated May 21, 2018, finding that a conviction for a serious offense, without a certificate of relief from disabilities or of good conduct, consideration of is a statutory petitioner's impediment application for that precludes registration as security guard and to remand the matter to respondent for a hearing before an impartial hearing officer is DENIED. DECISION The court agrees with respondent that Article 23-A of Correction Law is a codification of public policy "to encourage 158641/2018 DINGLE, JAMEL vs. DEPARTMENT OF STATE Motion No. 001 1 of 4 Page 1 of4 [*FILED: 2] NEW YORK COUNTY CLERK 11/06/2019 02:26 PM NYSCEF DOC. NO. 31 INDEX NO. 158641/2018 RECEIVED NYSCEF: 11/06/2019 the licensure and employment of persons previously convicted of one or more criminal offenses", recognizing "[t]he great expense and time involved in successful prosecuting and incarcerating the criminal offender is largely wasted if upon the individual's return to society his willingness to assume a law-abiding and productive role is frustrated by senseless discrimination." New York Correction Law § 7 53 ( 1) (a), (Governor's Approval Mem., Bill Jacket, L. 1976, c. 931). However, this court may not apply Correction Law § 753 (1) (a) to the petition at bar to the exclusion of the strictures of General Business Law § 89-h(5) that require that an applicant for registration as a security guard, as petitioner here: not have been convicted of a serious offense, or of a misdemeanor in the state or any offense in any other jurisdiction, which, if committed in this state, would constitute a misdemeanor, and which in the discretion of the secretary, bears such a relationship to the performance of the duties of a security guard, as to constitute a bar to employment . "It is . our well established rule that 'statutory language should be harmonized giving effect to each component and avoiding a construction that treats a word or phrase as superfluous'" (Nadkos, Inc. v Preferred Contractors Insurance Company Risk Retention Group, LLC, 34 NY3d 1, 7 [2019]). Petitioner's challenge to the determination of respondent that his two prior convictions for serious offenses, concededly 158641/2018 DINGLE, JAMEL vs. DEPARTMENT OF STATE Motion No. 001 2 of 4 Page 2 of 4 [*FILED: 3] NEW YORK COUNTY CLERK 11/06/2019 02:26 PM NYSCEF DOC. NO. 31 INDEX NO. 158641/2018 RECEIVED NYSCEF: 11/06/2019 two decades old, categorically disqualified him, without a certificate of relief from disabilities, or a certificate of good conduct or an executive pardon for those convictions, from registration as a security guard fails. His challenge is unpersuasive as his interpretation of GBL § 89-h(S) would render meaningless a component of the statutory language, i.e. petitioner's interpretation would render superfluous both the word "serious" and the phrase "or of a misdemeanor in the state or any offense in any other jurisdiction, which, if committed in this state, would constitute a misdemeanor". This court likewise agrees with argument of respondent that: "[t]his provision, through its sentence structure and the use of the disjunctive ',or' to separate the first clause from the remainder of the provision, bifurcates the application process into two tracks. First, where an applicant has been convicted of a 'serious offense,' GBL § 89-h(S)imposes a statutory bar to registration. In order to obtain registration as a security guard, such an applicant must present specific documentation to remove the felony conviction as a bar to registration. . Second, where an applicant has been convicted of a misdemeanor, the Secretary of State must consider whether the offense 'bears such a relationship to the performance of the duties of a security guard, as to constitute a bar to employment.'" Decisions in Bonaventure v Perales, 106 AD3d 665 2013) (1st Dept. (past convictions were for assault and larceny, each misdemeanors) and Thomas v New York City Department of Education, 46 Misc3d 308, 312 (Supreme Court, NY Co. 2014) 158641/2018 DINGLE, JAMEL vs. DEPARTMENT OF STATE Motion No. 001 3 of 4 Page 3 of 4 [*FILED: 4] NEW YORK COUNTY CLERK 11/06/2019 02:26 PM NYSCEF DOC. NO. 31 INDEX NO. 158641/2018 RECEIVED NYSCEF: 11/06/2019 (petitioner possessed a certificate of relief from disabilities) are not to the contrary. Finally, petitioner's lament that respondent's having found his application incomplete for not including a certificate of relief from disabilities or certificate of good conduct is tantamount to respondent's denial of such application presupposes, without explanation, that pursuing and obtaining such certification, and thereby completing his application to register as a security guard, is not an option for petitioner. 11/4/2019 DATE CHECK ONE: CASE DISPOSED 8 GRANTED APPLICATION: CHECK IF APPROPRIATE: 0 DENIED SETTLE ORDER INCLUDES TRANSFER/REASSIGN 158641/2018 DINGLE, JAMEL vs. DEPARTMENT OF STATE Motion No. 001 4 of 4 D OTHER D REFERENCE Page 4 of4

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.