Lorimer v Board of Mgrs. of one Madison Ave. Condominium

Annotate this Case

Download PDF

Lorimer v Board of Mgrs. of one Madison Ave. Condominium 2019 NY Slip Op 33096(U) October 17, 2019 Supreme Court, New York County Docket Number: 158870/2015 Judge: Paul A. Goetz Cases posted with a "30000" identifier, i.e., 2013 NY Slip Op 30001(U), are republished from various New York State and local government sources, including the New York State Unified Court System's eCourts Service. This opinion is uncorrected and not selected for official publication. [*FILED: 1] NEW YORK COUNTY CLERK 10/17/2019 04:30 PM NYSCEF DOC. NO. 77 INDEX NO. 158870/2015 RECEIVED NYSCEF: 10/17/2019 SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK NEW YORK COUNTY PRESENT: HON. PAUL A. GOETZ PART IAS MOTION 47EFM Justice ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------X MARY LORIMER, INDEX NO. MOTION DATE 158870/2015 10/10/2019 Plaintiff, MOTION SEQ. NO. 002 -vBOARD OF MANAGERS OF ONE MADISON AVENUE CONDOMINIUM, SL GREEN REALTY CORP., SL GREEN MANAGEMENT LLC,MI NY CLOCK TOWER, LLC,CREDIT SUISSE (USA), INC.,CUSHMAN & WAKEFIELD, INC.,CUSHMAN & WAKEFIELD CLEANING SERVICES, INC.,CUSHMAN & WAKEFIELD FACILITIES MANAGEMENT, INC. DECISION + ORDER ON MOTION Defendant. ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------X The following e-filed documents, listed by NYSCEF document number (Motion 002) 39, 40, 41, 42, 43, 44,45,46,47,48,49, 50, 51, 52, 53, 54, 55, 56, 57, 58, 59,60, 61, 62, 63, 64,65, 66, 67,68,69, 70, 71, 72, 73, 74, 75, 76 were read on this motion to/for JUDGMENT-SUMMARY Plaintiff Mary Lorimer alleges that she was injured on May 15, 2014, when she slipped and fell on water in the lobby of 1 Madison Avenue at approximately 12:50 pm. Defendants SL Green Realty Corp., SL Green Management LLC, the owners of the building, and defendant Credit Suisse (USA), Inc., the lessee, now move pursuant to CPLR 3212 for summary judgment seeking dismissal of the complaint based on lack of actual or constructive notice of the alleged defective condition of the lobby floor. The SL Green defendants also move for dismissal on the ground that they are an out of possession landlord with no responsibility for maintaining the premises, which plaintiff does not oppose. Defendants Cushman & Wakefield, Inc., Cushman & Wakefield Cleaning Services, Inc. and Cushman & Wakefield Facilities Management, Inc., the management company, cross-moves for dismissal of the complaint and any cross-claims asserted 158870/2015 LORIMER, MARY vs. BOARD OF MANAGERS OF ONE Motion No. 002 1 of 4 Page 1of4 [*FILED: 2] NEW YORK COUNTY CLERK 10/17/2019 04:30 PM NYSCEF DOC. NO. 77 INDEX NO. 158870/2015 RECEIVED NYSCEF: 10/17/2019 against them based on lack of actual and constructive notice and rely on the movants' papers to support their motion. On a motion for summary judgment based on lack of notice, defendant has the initial burden of making a prima facie showing that it neither created the hazardous condition nor had actual or constructive notice of its existence. Infante v. Jerome Car Wash, 52 A.D.3d 319, 320 (1st Dep't 2008). To meet its prima facie burden on the issue of constructive notice in a slip-andfall case, a defendant must offer some evidence as to when the area in question was last cleaned or inspected relative to the time when the plaintiff fell. Hobbs v. New York City Hous. Auth., 168 A.D.3d 634 (1st Dep't 2019) (citing Gautier v. 941 lntervale Realty LLC, 108 A.D.3d 481 [1st Dep't 2013]). Reference to general cleaning practices is insufficient to establish a lack of constructive notice. Gautier, 108 A.D.3d at 481. Here, defendants have failed to meet this burden. With respect to actual notice, defendants did not submit any evidence that they lacked actual notice of the condition, by, for example, showing that they did not receive any complaints about the defect prior to the incident and that there were no similar accidents at the subject location. Clarkin v. In Line Restaurant Corp., 148 A.D.3d 559, 560 (1st Dep't 2017). Likewise, defendants failed to meet their burden on the issue of constructive notice as they failed to offer any evidence as to when the subject area was last inspected or cleaned. Hobbs, 168 A.D.3d at 635. Defendants argue that it is unnecessary for them to submit evidence regarding lack of constructive notice since plaintiff does not know how long the water was on the floor prior to her fall and any argument that the water was there for a sufficient time such that defendants should have been aware of it, would be speculative. See Early v. Hilton Hotels Corp., 73 A.D.3d 559, 562 (1st Dep't 2010). However, unlike the cases cited by defendants, here, defendants have 158870/2015 LORIMER, MARY vs. BOARD OF MANAGERS OF ONE Motion No. 002 2 of 4 Page 2 of 4 [*FILED: 3] NEW YORK COUNTY CLERK 10/17/2019 04:30 PM NYSCEF DOC. NO. 77 INDEX NO. 158870/2015 RECEIVED NYSCEF: 10/17/2019 failed to meet their burden with respect to the issue of lack of actual notice of the condition. Id. at 561. Moreover, plaintiff has submitted sufficient evidence to create an issue of fact regarding whether there was any precipitation outside prior to her accident such that defendants would have constructive notice of a wet condition on the floor. Affirmation of Edward Cohn dated July 18, 2019, Exhs. E and F (climate reports showing small amounts of precipitation on date of the accident), and Exh. K (video of the lobby on the date of incident showing some people carrying umbrellas and caution signs out on the floor). Accordingly, it is ORDERED that the motion and the cross-motion for summary judgment are denied except that all claims and cross-claims against defendants SL Green Realty Corp. and SL Green Management LLC are dismissed, and the Clerk shall enter judgment accordingly with costs and disbursements awarded to said defendants; and it is further ORDERED that the action is severed and continued against the remaining defendants; and it is further ORDERED that the caption shall be amended to reflect the dismissal of defendants SL Green Realty Corp. and SL Green Management; and it is further ORDERED that counsel for the moving party shall serve a copy of this order with notice of entry upon the Clerk of the Court (60 Centre Street, Room 141 B) and the Clerk of the General Clerk's Office (60 Centre Street, Room 119), who are directed to mark the court's records to reflect the change in the caption herein; and it is further ORDERED that such service upon the Clerk of the Court and the Clerk of the General Clerk's Office shall be made in accordance with the procedures set forth in the Protocol on Courthouse and County Clerk Procedures for Electronically Filed Cases (accessible at the "EFiling" page on the court's website at the address wvvw.nycourts.gov/supctmanh)]. 158870/2015 LORIMER, MARY vs. BOARD OF MANAGERS OF ONE Motion No. 002 3 of 4 Page 3 of 4 [*FILED: 4] NEW YORK COUNTY CLERK 10/17/2019 04:30 PM NYSCEF DOC. NO. 77 RECEIVED NYSCEF: 10/17/2019 /tJ/;7/;<j DATE CHECK ONE: INDEX NO. 158870/2015 CASE DISPOSED GRANTED D ~ DENIED p~ NON-FINAL DISPOSITION GRANTED IN PART APPLICATION: SETTLE ORDER SUBMIT ORDER CHECK IF APPROPRIATE: INCLUDES TRANSFER/REASSIGN FIDUCIARY APPOINTMENT 158870/2015 LORIMER, MARY vs. BOARD OF MANAGERS OF ONE Motion No. 002 4 of 4 D OTHER D REFERENCE Page 4 of 4

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.