Strategic Funding Source, Inc. v Baku Caspian Corp.
Annotate this Case
Download PDF
Strategic Funding Source, Inc. v Baku Caspian Corp. 2019 NY Slip Op 31220(U) May 2, 2019 Supreme Court, New York County Docket Number: 652014/2017 Judge: Joel M. Cohen Cases posted with a "30000" identifier, i.e., 2013 NY Slip Op 30001(U), are republished from various New York State and local government sources, including the New York State Unified Court System's eCourts Service. This opinion is uncorrected and not selected for official publication. [*FILED: 1] NEW YORK COUNTY CLERK 05/03/2019 09:38 AM NYSCEF DOC. NO. 15 INDEX NO. 652014/2017 RECEIVED NYSCEF: 05/03/2019 SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK NEW YORK COUNTY PRESENT: HON. JOEL M. COHEN PART IAS MOTION 3EFM Justice --------------------------------------------------------------------------------X INDEX NO. 652014/2017 STRATEGIC FUNDING SOURCE, INC., MOTION DATE N/A MOTION SEQ. NO. 001 Plaintiff, -vBAKU CASPIAN CORP, ALI AZIMOV DECISION AND ORDER Defendant. ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------X The following e-filed documents, listed by NYSCEF document number (Motion 001) 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14 RELIEF OF COUNSEL were read on this motion for Upon the foregoing documents: This action was commenced by Strategic Funding Source, Inc., against Defendants Baku Caspian Corp. d/b/a Baku Caspian and Ali Azimov on March 31, 2017 alleging breach of contract. Defendants filed an Answer with counterclaims on May 10, 2017. Now before the Court is Amos Weinberg Esq.'s motion, brought by Order to Show Cause, to be relieved as counsel on behalf of Defendants. Mr. Weinberg cites unpaid legal fees as his reason for being unable to continue to work with Defendants. Weinberg Aff., ,-i3 (NYSCEF 10). The Order to Show Cause was signed on April 10, 2019 and directed opposition, if any, to this requested relief be filed by May 1, 2019 and further provided that a copy of the Order to Show Case and the supporting papers upon which it is based shall be served upon all Defendants by overnight and electronic delivery. Counsel filed affidavits of service attesting that copies were served upon the Defendants. No opposition having been filed, this motion is unopposed. For the following reasons, the Court grants counsel's motion to withdraw as attorney of record for Defendants. 652014/2017 STRATEGIC FUNDING SOURCE, INC. vs. BAKU CASPIAN CORP Motion No. 001 1 of 4 Page 1of4 [*FILED: 2] NEW YORK COUNTY CLERK 05/03/2019 09:38 AM NYSCEF DOC. NO. 15 INDEX NO. 652014/2017 RECEIVED NYSCEF: 05/03/2019 Mr. Weinberg asserts that there has been a breakdown in his relationship and communications with Defendants, due to their failure to remit payment for legal services as well as fees associated with a court-mandated mediation, rendering continued and effective representation of Defendants in this action impossible. Weinberg A.ff., iii-14-6. Supporting his motion, Mr. Weinberg includes snippets of email correspondence indicating that Mr. Weinberg advised Defendants that this matter was selected to participate in a mandatory mediation which would cost the parties $400/hour. Mr. Weinberg also discussed various settlement options with Defendants. After three emails, Mr. Weinberg never received a response from Defendants. Id. Relieving counsel from its representation of a party is appropriate where, inter alia, there is adequate evidence showing a breakdown in the attorney-client relationship. Robinson v. Friedman Mgt. Corp., 49 A.D. 3d 436, 437 (1st Dep't 2008); see also Bok v. Werner, 9 A.D.3d 318 (1st Dep 't 2004) (reversing denial of motion to withdraw as counsel in view of counsel's claimed breakdown in relationship with client); see also Rule 1.16(c)(5) of the Rules of Professional Conduct (a lawyer may withdraw from representing a client when: the client deliberately disregards an agreement or obligation to the lawyer as to expenses or fees). Movant has done so. Given that the case is at an early stage, and no discovery schedule has yet been entered, Defendants should not be prejudiced by a change in counsel. The Court concludes that Amos Weinberg, Esq. has made a sufficient showing of entitlement to withdraw as counsel for Defendants and his motion is Granted. Mr. Weinberg is directed to advise Baku Caspian Corp. that, as a corporation, it must retain new counsel and cannot appear prose. See, CPLR ยง32l(a). As for individually named Defendant Ali Azmiov, Mr. Weinberg is directed to comply with his obligation under Rule 1.16(e) of the Rules of Professional Conduct as stated below. 652014/2017 STRATEGIC FUNDING SOURCE, INC. vs. BAKU CASPIAN CORP Motion No. 001 2 of 4 Page 2 of 4 [*FILED: 3] NEW YORK COUNTY CLERK 05/03/2019 09:38 AM NYSCEF DOC. NO. 15 INDEX NO. 652014/2017 RECEIVED NYSCEF: 05/03/2019 It is therefore: ORDERED that the motion of Amos Weinberg, Esq. to be relieved as attorney for Defendants in this action is granted without opposition, subject to the following conditions; it is further ORDERED that Amos Weinberg, Esq. is to comply with its obligation under Rule 1.16(e) of the Rules of Professional Conduct, as applicable to the facts presented, to "take steps, to the extent reasonably practicable, to avoid foreseeable prejudice to the rights of the client, including giving reasonable notice to the client, allowing time for employment of other counsel, delivering to the client all papers and property to which the client is entitled, promptly refunding any part of a fee paid in advance that has not been earned and complying with applicable laws and rules."; it is further ORDERED that, within 10 days from entry, Mr. Weinberg shall serve a copy of this order with notice of entry upon both Baku Caspian Corp.d/b/a Baku Caspian and Ali Azimov by email and by hard copy at their last known address by certified mail, return receipt requested, and upon the attorneys for all other parties appearing herein by posting to the New York State Courts Electronic Filing System; it is further ORDERED that, together with the copy of this order with notice of entry served upon Defendants, moving counsel shall forward a notice directing both Defendants to appoint a substitute attorney within 30 days from the date of the mailing of the notice and the client shall comply therewith, except that, in the event defendant Azimov intends instead to represent himself, he shall notify the Clerk of the Part of this decision in writing within said 30-day period; it is further 652014/2017 STRATEGIC FUNDING SOURCE, INC. vs. BAKU CASPIAN CORP Motion No. 001 3 of 4 Page 3 of 4 [*FILED: 4] NEW YORK COUNTY CLERK 05/03/2019 09:38 AM NYSCEF DOC. NO. 15 INDEX NO. 652014/2017 RECEIVED NYSCEF: 05/03/2019 ORDERED that any new attorney retained by Defendants shall file a notice of appearance with the Clerk of the General Clerk's Office (60 Centre Street, Room 119) and the Clerk of the Part within 40 days from the date the notice to retain new counsel is mailed; it is further ORDERED that no further proceedings may be taken against either Defendant without leave of this court for a period of 40 days after service on Defendants of the aforesaid notice to appoint a substitute attorney; it is further ORDERED that the departing attorney shall, within 10 days from entry, serve a copy of this order with notice of entry on the Clerk of the General Clerk's Office (Room 119); it is further ORDERED that such service upon the Clerk of the General Clerk's Office, the filing of a notice of appearance as provided herein, and the filing of papers as aforesaid shall be made in accordance with the procedures set forth in the Protocol on Courthouse and County Clerk Procedures for Electronically Filed Cases (accessible at the "E-Filing" page on the court's website at the address www.nycourts.gov/supctmanh); and it is further ORDERED that all parties are to appear for a Preliminary Conference in this matter on June 25, 2019 at 11:00 a.m. 5/02/2019 DATE CHECK ONE: CASE DISPOSED GRANTED D NON-FINAL DISPOSITION DENIED GRANTED IN PART APPLICATION: SETTLE ORDER SUBMIT ORDER CHECK IF APPROPRIATE: INCLUDES TRANSFER/REASSIGN FIDUCIARY APPOINTMENT 652014/2017 STRATEGIC FUNDING SOURCE, INC. vs. BAKU CASPIAN CORP Motion No. 001 4 of 4 D D OTHER REFERENCE Page 4 of 4
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
