Burlington Ins. Co. v Castillo Iron Works, Inc.

Annotate this Case

Download PDF

Burlington Ins. Co. v Castillo Iron Works, Inc. 2019 NY Slip Op 31120(U) April 22, 2019 Supreme Court, New York County Docket Number: 151907/2018 Judge: Joel M. Cohen Cases posted with a "30000" identifier, i.e., 2013 NY Slip Op 30001(U), are republished from various New York State and local government sources, including the New York State Unified Court System's eCourts Service. This opinion is uncorrected and not selected for official publication. [*FILED: 1] NEW YORK COUNTY CLERK 04/26/2019 12:27 PM NYSCEF DOC. NO. 39 INDEX NO. 151907/2018 RECEIVED NYSCEF: 04/26/2019 SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK NEW YORK COUNTY PRESENT: PART HON. JOEL M. COHEN IAS MOTION 3EFM Justice --------------------------------------------------------------------------------X INDEX NO. THE BURLINGTON INSURANCE COMPANY MOTION DATE 151907/2018 02/25/2019 Plaintiff, MOTION SEQ. NO. 002 - vCASTILLO IRON WORKS, INC., DECISION AND ORDER Defendant. ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------X The following e-filed documents, listed by NYSCEF document number (Motion 002) 33, 34, 35 were read on this motion to: RELIEVE COUNSEL Upon the foregoing documents: This action was commenced by The Burlington Insurance Company against Defendant Castillo Iron Works, Inc. on March 2, 2018 alleging breach of contract, account stated and attorney's fees. Defendant filed an Answer with counterclaims on May 18, 2018. Now before the Court is Redmond Law's motion, brought by Order to Show Cause, to be relieved as counsel on behalf of Defendant. Mr. Lee Kaplan, on behalf of Redmond Law, cites unpaid legal fees as his reason for being unable to continue to work with Defendant. Kaplan A.ff., if5-7 (NYSCEF 13). This relief is being sought by way of Notice of Motion and was unopposed. Counsel filed affidavits of service attesting that a copy of this motion was served upon Defendant and Plaintiffs counsel. No opposition having been filed, this motion is unopposed. For the following reasons, the Court grants counsel's motion to withdraw as attorney ofrecord for Defendant. Relieving counsel from its representation of a party is appropriate where, inter alia, there is adequate evidence showing a breakdown in the attorney-client relationship. Robinson v. Friedman Mgt. Corp., 49 A.D. 3d 436, 437 (1st Dep't 2008); see also Bok v. Werner, 9 A.D.3d 151907/2018 BURLINGTON INSURANCE vs. CASTILLO IRON WORKS, INC. Motion No. 003 1 of 8 Page 1of4 [*FILED: 2] NEW YORK COUNTY CLERK 04/26/2019 12:27 PM NYSCEF DOC. NO. 39 INDEX NO. 151907/2018 RECEIVED NYSCEF: 04/26/2019 318 (I st Dep't 2004) (reversing denial of motion to withdraw as counsel in view of counsel's claimed breakdown in relationship with client); see also Rule l.16(c)(5) of the Rules of Professional Conduct (a lawyer may withdraw from representing a client when: the client deliberately disregards an agreement or obligation to the lawyer as to expenses or fees). Movant has done so. Given that the case is at an early stage, and no discovery schedule has yet been entered, Defendant should not be prejudiced by a change in counsel. The Court concludes that Redmond Law PLLC has made a sufficient showing of entitlement to withdraw as counsel for Defendant and its motion is Granted. Redmond Law PLLC is directed to advise Defendant Castillo Iron Works, Inc. that, as a corporation, it must retain new counsel and cannot appear prose. See, CPLR §32l(a). It is therefore: ORDERED that the motion of Redmond Law PLLC to be relieved as attorney for Defendant in this action is granted without opposition, subject to the following conditions; it is further ORDERED that Redmond Law PLLC is to comply with its obligation under Rule 1.16(e) of the Rules of Professional Conduct, as applicable to the facts presented, to "take steps, to the extent reasonably practicable, to avoid foreseeable prejudice to the rights of the client, including giving reasonable notice to the client, allowing time for employment of other counsel, delivering to the client all papers and property to which the client is entitled, promptly refunding any part of a fee paid in advance that has not been earned and complying with applicable laws and rules."; it is further ORDERED that, within 10 days from entry, Redmond Law PLLC shall serve a copy of this order with notice of entry upon Defendant Castillo Iron Works, Inc. by email and by hard copy 151907/2018 BURLINGTON INSURANCE vs. CASTILLO IRON WORKS, INC. Motion No. 003 2 of 8 Page 2 of 4 [*FILED: 3] NEW YORK COUNTY CLERK 04/26/2019 12:27 PM NYSCEF DOC. NO. 39 INDEX NO. 151907/2018 RECEIVED NYSCEF: 04/26/2019 at its last known address by certified mail, return receipt requested, and upon the attorneys for all other parties appearing herein by posting to the New York State Courts Electronic Filing System; it is further ORDERED that, together with the copy of this order with notice of entry served upon Defendant, moving counsel shall forward a notice directing Defendant to appoint a substitute attorney within 30 days from the date of the mailing of the notice and the client shall comply therewith; it is further ORDERED that any new attorney retained by Defendant shall file a notice of appearance with the Clerk of the General Clerk's Office (60 Centre Street, Room 119) and the Clerk of the Part within 40 days from the date the notice to retain new counsel is mailed; it is further ORDERED that no further proceedings may be taken against Defendant without leave of this court for a period of 40 days after service on Defendant of the aforesaid notice to appoint a substitute attorney; it is further ORDERED that the departing firm shall, within 10 days from entry, serve a copy of this order with notice of entry on the Clerk of the General Clerk's Office (Room 119); it is further ORDERED that such service upon the Clerk of the General Clerk's Office, the filing of a notice of appearance as provided herein, and the filing of papers as aforesaid shall be made in accordance with the procedures set forth in the Protocol on Courthouse and County Clerk Procedures for Electronically Filed Cases (accessible at the "E-Filing" page on the court's website at the address www.nycourts.gov/supctmanh); and it is further 151907/2018 BURLINGTON INSURANCE vs. CASTILLO IRON WORKS, INC. Motion No. 003 3 of 8 Page 3 of 4 [*FILED: 4] NEW YORK COUNTY CLERK 04/26/2019 12:27 PM NYSCEF DOC. NO. 39 INDEX NO. 151907/2018 RECEIVED NYSCEF: 04/26/2019 ORDERED that all parties are to appear at a Preliminary Conference on June 25; 2019 at 10:00 a.m. 4/22/2019 DATE CHECK ONE: CASE DISPOSED GRANTED D NON-FINAL DISPOSITION DENIED X GRANTED IN PART APPLICATION: SETTLE ORDER SUBMIT ORDER CHECK IF APPROPRIATE: INCLUDES TRANSFER/REASSIGN FIDUCIARY APPOINTMENT 151907/2018 BURLINGTON INSURANCE vs. CASTILLO IRON WORKS, INC. Motion No. 003 4 of 8 D OTHER D REFERENCE Page 4 of 4

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.