Murrow v Artcraft Silversmiths Inc.

Annotate this Case

Download PDF

Murrow v Artcraft Silversmiths Inc. 2019 NY Slip Op 30338(U) February 11, 2019 Supreme Court, New York County Docket Number: 159077/2017 Judge: Kathryn E. Freed Cases posted with a "30000" identifier, i.e., 2013 NY Slip Op 30001(U), are republished from various New York State and local government sources, including the New York State Unified Court System's eCourts Service. This opinion is uncorrected and not selected for official publication. [* 1] INDEX NO. 159077/2017 NYSCEF DOC. NO. 27 I i PRESENT: I RECEIVED NYSCEF: 02/14/2019 SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK NEW YORK COUNTY HON. KATHRYN·E. FREED PART IAS MOTION 2EFM Justice 1 ---------1---------------------------------------------------------------X I JESSICA MURROW, INDEX NO. 159077/2017 I Plaintiff, MOTION SEQ. NO. I 001 -v- ARTCRAFT SILVERSMITHS INC. and ROBERT VITULLI, i DECISION AND ORDER Defendants. _________ .J. ________________________________________________________________ x I The follbwing e-filed documents, listed by NYSCEF document number (Motion 001) 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21 c HAN G E VENUE I on th.1s motion · to/for were read ! I Upon tJ{e foregoing documents, it is ordered that the motion is denied in all respects. I : i ' in this action by plaintiff Jessica Murrow sounding, inter alia, in conversion and replevin, I ArtcraftI Silversmiths Inc. ("Artcraft") and Robert Vitulli ("Vitulli") (collectively "defendants") i move td change the place of trial of this action to Westchester County on the basis of improper I venue p~rsuant to CPLR 511 or, in the alternative, to change the venue of this action to Westchester County !pursuant to CPLR 510 based on the convenience of material witnesses and pursuant to i I CPLR 508 based on the fact that the chattels involved in the action are located in Westchester. I After or~! argument, and after a review of the motion papers and the relevant statutes and case law, I i ' the motion is denied in all respects. I I i 159077/2017 MURROW, JESSICA vs. ARTCRAFT SILVERSMITHS INC. Motion No. 001 1 of 4 Page 1of4 [* 2] INDEX NO. 159077/2017 NYSCEF DOC. NO. 27 RECEIVED NYSCEF: 02/14/2019 FACTUAL AND PROCEDURAL BACKGROUND In 1981, two musical instruments created by the renowned instrument maker A. Laubin, Inc. were stolen from plaintiff, a classical musician, while she rode the New York City Subway. ! Plaintiff subsequently learned that defendants Artcraft and Vitulli were in possession of the instrun\ents and sought to sell the same. In May, 2017, plaintiff went to defendants' place of business in the Westchester County town of Mt. Vernon, New York in an attempt to have the instruments returned to her. The Mt. Vernon police responded to defendants' place of business and generated a police report stating, inter alia, that plaintiff resided in Massachusetts. In October 2017, after defendants refused to return the instruments, plaintiff commenced the captioned action I seeking' to recover them. The summons reflected that venue was based on plaintiffs residence in ~ New York County. Defendants joined issue by their answer, filed November 21, 2017. On the same day their answer was filed, defendants served a demand to change venue, pursuant to CPLR 511, to Westchester County on the ground that the Mt. Vernon police report reflected that plaintiff lived in Massachusetts. Alternatively, the demand sought a change of venue pursuant to CPLR 508 on the ground that the chattels sought to be recovered were located in Westchester County. Further, defendants sought to change venue to Westchester County based on CPLR 510(3) because all material witnesses were located there. On December 5, 2017, defendants filed the instant motion seeking to change venue. In support of the motion, defendants assert that a change of venue to Westchester County must be granted due to plaintiffs failure to submit an affidavit in opposition to their demand to change venue. They further assert that venue must be changed to Westchester County because that is 159077/2017 MURROW, JESSICA vs. ARTCRAFT SILVERSMITHS INC. Motion No. 001 2 of 4 Page 2 of4 [* 3] INDEX NO. 159077/2017 NYSCEF DOC. NO. 27 RECEIVED NYSCEF: 02/14/2019 where the instruments are located. Additionally, defendants maintain that the case must be venued in Westchester County because "all material witnesses" are located there. In opposition to the motion, plaintiff argues that defendants' motion must be denied since they failed to establish that she did not reside in New York County at the time the action was commenced, that transfer of venue to Westchester County was not required simply because the instruments were in that county, and that defendants failed to show that the case had to be venued in Westchester County for the convenience of material witnesses. LEGAL CONCLUSIONS That branch of the motion seeking a change of venue pursuant to CPLR 5 I 1 is denied. As plaintiff asserts, the police accident report showing that she lived in Massachusetts was, in and of itself, insufficient to establish that she did not maintain a residence in New York County at the time the action was commenced. See Chehab v Roitman, 120 AD3d 736 (2d Dept 2014). The branch of the motion seeking a change of venue based on the convenience of material witnesses is denied as well. "A change of venue based on the convenience of witnesses may only be granted after there has been a detailed evidentiary showing that the convenience of nonparty witnesses would in fact be served by the granting of such relief. O'Brien v Vassar Bros. Hosp., 207 A.D.2d I 69 (2d Dept 1995); Kraft v Kamalian, 290 A.D.2d 264 (I 51 Dept 2002). The affidavit in support of such motion must contain the names, addresses and occupations of the prospective witnesses, must disclose the facts to which the proposed witnesses will testify at the trial, must show that the proposed witnesses are, in fact, willing to testify and must show how the proposed witnesses would be inconvenienced in the event that a change of venue is not granted." Jacobs v Banh Shapiro Gettinger Waldinger & Brennan, LLP, 9 AD3d 299, 299 (I st Dept 2004). Since 159077/2017 MURROW, JESSICA vs. ARTCRAFT SILVERSMITHS INC. Motion No. 001 3 of 4 Page 3 of4 [* 4] INDEX NO. 159077/2017 NYSCEF DOC. NO. 27 RECEIVED NYSCEF: 02/14/2019 defendants have failed to submit the detailed information required above, a change of venue cannot be granted on this basis. Moreover, defendants are not entitled to a change of venue to Westchester County merely because the instruments are located there. Although CPLR 508 provides that the "place of trial of an action to recover a chattel may be in the county in which any part of the subject of the action is situated at the time of the commencement of the action", "that section is pem1issive and not mandatory" and thus "does not preclude an action in another venue." Tower Broadcasting, LLC v Equinox Broadcasting C01p., 160 AD3d 1435, 1437 (4 1h Dept 2018). Therefore, in light of the foregoing, it is hereby: ORDERED that the motion by defendants Artcraft Silversmiths Inc. <;md Robert Vitulli seeking to change the venue of this action to Supreme Court, Westchester County is denied in all respects; and it is further ORDERED that this constitutes the decision and order of the court. 2/11/2019 DATE CHECK ONE: § CASE DISPOSED GRANTED APPLICATION: I CHECK IF APPROPRIATE: 0 DENIED SETTLE ORDER INCLUDES TRANSFER/REASSIGN 159077/2017 MURROW, JESSICA vs. ARTCRAFT SILVERSMITHS INC. Motion No. 001 4 of 4 D OTHER D REFERENCE Page4 of4

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.