Forman v Henkin

Annotate this Case

Download PDF

Forman v Henkin 2014 NY Slip Op 30679(U) February 28, 2014 Supreme Court, New York County Docket Number: 113059/2011 Judge: Lucy Billings Cases posted with a "30000" identifier, i.e., 2013 NY Slip Op 30001(U), are republished from various state and local government websites. These include the New York State Unified Court System's E-Courts Service, and the Bronx County Clerk's office. This opinion is uncorrected and not selected for official publication. -----!l!ll·.-·."··. . SCANNEDON3/19/20141--.....----..------...---llllll!lll.... [* 1] !J! l l!i,.,!1 !'!~, "'",- - - - - - - - - - - - ¢ . ·····~1!1111. '""· SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK NEW YORK COUNTY PART PRESENT: 'tu Justice Index Number : 113059/2011 FORMAN, KELLY 1NDEX N O . - - - - - vs. MOTION DATE _ _ __ HENKIN, MARK SEQUENCE NUMBER : 002 COMPEL. MOTION SEQ. NO. _ __ The following pap~rs, numbered 1 to_!±__, were read on .this motion tolfpf ~UJ!1><k~z;....i4'ic;...:.... ~~~------- Notice of Motion/Order to Show Cause -Affidavits - Exhibits Answering Affidavits - Exhibits------------------- Replying Affidavits _ _ _ _- " " " " - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - I No(s). I ... 2. I No(s). _ ___....l_ __ I No(s). --*--- Upon the foregoing papers, it is ordered that~ : ~ UJCWI ~~$ ~'.5 /\Wttl>11°V ~l's~~ ()!'·fl>: ~bi- fv 1 pltv~ff·.s ~s<J.D~ to '(w. #tr.ul w -~ wi. 1w ~/ft'ri'l.!. ~1~ ~~ µ"'1 ¢3 ~ iV1 :tw. .~'\1 tk<JfJ1tlv1 Wt-1-1-Ju-J,.,. fM4Jr ~~ ~ µ~~> IMtfrW . C.f.L.1-. .· ~ l JI 2-4 I 312(;. "(1J w 0 j::: en :::> .., I e c FILED w a:: ,. a:: "~ a:: .>- tJ; _, z _, MAR 19 2014 - NEW YORK :::> 0 u. en .... <C 0 w COUNriOl.BleoAu: ' w a:: 3i w (!) w . en :: ..J ' . . z -c a:: !!? ~ B <C u.. ~ z :I: 0 0 w Q .... .... a:: J :!i: u.. Dated: ,. j /let 1. 'lf 1. CHECK ONE: ...... :................................................................ 0 CASE DISPOSED . 2. CHECK AS APPROPRIATE: ...........................MOTION IS: 3. CHECK IF APPROPRIATE: ................................................ ::\· 0 GRANTED 0 0 SETTLE ORDER Opo NOT POST [B1.ION-FINAL DISPOSITION DENIED ~GRANTED IN PART 0 0 OTHER SUBMIT ORDER 0FIDUCIARY APPOINTMENT 0 REFERENCE [* 2] SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK COUNTY OF NEW YORK: PART 46 --------------------------------------x Index No. 113059/2011 KELLY FORMAN, Plaintiff - against - DECISION AND ORDER MARK HENKIN, Defendant --------------------------------------x LUCY BILLINGS, J.S.C.: Plaintiff sues for injuries suffered in a fall from defendant's horse. Defendant moves to compel plaintiff to provide authorizations to obtain records of (1) her private Facebook postings and (2) loans she has received to be repaid from this action's proceeds. C.P.L.R. § 3124. The parties' stipulation November 7, 2013, resolved all other disclosure or penalties for plaintiff's motion. C.P.L.R. §§ nondi~clfiufe~o(!nDy i 3124, 3126. ~-''·C) i'i, I. defendant's ,-\ .i 19 2014 FACEBOOK POSTINGS ,.. NEV; YORK Among the records from pl~Q~Mfff'iCf:;E~~~ccount, which .... plaintiff has deactivated since she commenced this action, defendant specifically seeks photographs, status messages, and instant messages. At plaintiff's deposition plaintiff testified that before her injuries claimed in this action she posted on Facebook photographs of herself engaging in various activities, but that she no longer engages in those activities as a result of her injuries. forman.156 Plaintiff claims that a brain injury caused by the 1 [* 3] fall from defendant's horse has impaired her memory and her ability to read and write. Consequently, at her deposition she did not recall whether she had posted any photographs on Facebook since her injury and testified that since her injury she has been unable to compose emails and text messages. Photographs of plaintiff before her injury are of little probative value. If she did post such photographs on Facebook, they only will corroborate her testimony. If she did not post such photographs, their absence will not show that she did not engage in various activities before her injury that she no longer engages in. Nevertheless, insofar as plaintiff intends to introduce at trial photographs of her privately posted on Facebook before her injury, she shall provide all such photographs to defendant within 20 days after service of this order with notice of entry. C.P.L.R. §§ 3120(1) (i) and (2), 3124. Photographs of plaintiff engaging in various activities after her injury, particularly any activities she claims she no longer is able to engage in due to her fall from defendant's horse, are of greater probative value. Patterson v. Turner Constr. Co., 88 A.D.3d 617, 618 (1st Dep't 2011); Richards v. McCarthy, 100 A.D.3d 728, 730 (2d Dep't 2012). Since plaintiff has failed to provide any information whether she privately posted any photographs on Facebook after her injury, within 20 days after service of this order with notice of entry, she shall obtain any photographs of her privately posted on Facebook after forman.156 2 [* 4] her injury and provide all such photographs to defendant that do not show nudity or romantic encounters. Richards v. McCarthy, 100 A.D.3d at 730. Defendant further seeks pre-injury and post-injury writings to ascertain the impact of plaintiff's injury on her ability to reason, find words, write, and communicate effectively. Yet defendant has not shown an inability to obtain plaintiff's writings other than her private status messages and instant messages on her Facebook account. Defendant is entitled to request plaintiff's writings since her injury and for a limited period leading up to her injury for comparison. Defendant is entitled to a psychological and a physical examination of plaintiff to assess her ability to read, reason, find words, write, and communicate effectively. Her writing product other than her private Facebook messages and the constraints of a single psychological and single physical examination, however, may not fully reveal the frequency, speed, and volume of her writing. Therefore, within 20 days after service of this order with notice of entry, plaintiff shall authorize defendant to obtain records from Facebook, including archived or deleted records, showing each time plaintiff posted a private message and the number of characters or words in the text of each private message, from the date of her injury until she deactivated her Facebook account. Id. Defendant completely fails to show how his request for his associates' messages on plaintiff's Facebook account, insofar as forman.156 3 [* 5] they are not public or available from the authors, to validate her accusation that his associates transmitted harassing messages, is relevant to her claims or his defenses in this action. Therefore he is not entitled to obtain any information concerning these messages from plaintiff's private Facebook account. Abrams v. Pecile, 83 A.D.3d 527, 528 (1st Dep't 2011) i Richards v. McCarthy, 100 A.D.3d at 730-31; Mccann v. Harleysville Ins. Co. of N.Y., 78 A.D.3d 1524, 1525 (4th Dep't 2010). II. LOANS Defendant cites no authority supporting his entitlement to information concerning loans to be repaid by plaintiff. as they are to be repaid 1 As long even if they are to be repaid only from her recovery in this action 1 they are not a collateral source to compensate plaintiff for her injuries or losses claimed in this action. C.P.L.R. § 4545(a) i Oden v. Chemung County Indus. Dev. Agency, 87 N.Y.2d 81, 83-84 (1995) i Stowlowski v. Bellew, 89 A.D.3d 549 (1st Dep't 2011); Johnson v. New York City Tr. Auth., 88 A.D.3d 321 1 327 28 (1st Dep t 2011); Staats v. Wegmans Food 1 Mkts., Inc., 63 A.D.3d 1573, 1574 (4th Dep't 2009). Neither are any such loans liens imposed on her potential recovery pursuant to any statute that would obligate defendant to satisfy the lien if plaintiff does recover in this action. Obviously defendant is not a party to the loan transactions and thus is not contractually obligated to repay the loans. Nor are they part of plaintiff's damages from her claimed injuries or losses. forman.156 4 Since [* 6] defendant presents no basis on which loans plaintiff has received are relevant to her claims or his defenses, he is not entitled to information concerning such loans. III. CONCLUSION In sum, the court grants defendant's motion to compel disclosure to the following extent. C.P.L.R. § 3124. Within 20 days after service of this order with notice of entry, plaintiff shall provide to defendant: 1. all photographs of her privately posted on Facebook before her injury claimed in this action that she intends to introduce at trial; 2. all photographs of her privately posted on Facebook after her injury that do not show nudity or romantic encounters; and 3. authorizations to obtain records from Facebook, including archived or deleted records, showing each time plaintiff posted a private message and the number of characters or words in the text of each private message, since her injury. The court otherwise denies defendant's motion, except insofar as plaintiff stipulated November 7, 2013, to the relief sought. This decision constitutes the court's order. DATED: February 28, · f l LED 201~ · MAR 19 2014 N8NYORK L~ V°O'l~s COUNTY CLER~S OFfl~ forman.156 5

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.