Born to Build LLC v Saleh

Annotate this Case

Download PDF

Born to Build LLC v Saleh 2013 NY Slip Op 33941(U) July 11, 2013 Supreme Court, Nassau County Docket Number: 002345/11 Judge: Stephen A. Bucaria Cases posted with a "30000" identifier, i.e., 2013 NY Slip Op 30001(U), are republished from various state and local government websites. These include the New York State Unified Court System's E-Courts Service, and the Bronx County Clerk's office. This opinion is uncorrected and not selected for official publication. [* 1] SHORT FORM ORDER SUPREME COURT - STATE OF NEW YORK Present: HON. STEPHEN A. BUCARIA Justice ORIGINAL TRIAL/IAS, PART 1 NASSAU COUNTY BORN TO BUILD LLC, INDEX No. 002345/11 Plaintiff, MOTION DATE: June 21, 2013 Motion Sequence # 014, 016 -againstIBRAHIM SALEH, a/k/a Abraham Saleh, a/k/a Kamel Saleh, a/k/a Kamel Y. Saleh, a/k/a Kamel Youssef Saleh, a/k/a Yaakoub Saleh, a/k/a Kaakoub Y. Saleh, a/k/a Yaakoub Youssef Saleh, 1141 REALTY LLC, KARIM BIN TALEB, a/k/a Karim Bentelab, BORN TO BUILD CONSTRUCTION CORP., SARITA VASWANI, BANCO POPULAR OF NORTH AMERICA, EDMUND A. NAHAS, ZRAICK, NAHAS & RICH, AND JOHN DOES 1through10 (such parties being persons or entities who have possession of plaintiffs tools and equipment, or who own or control the places where such tools and equipment are stored), Defendants. The following papers read on this motion: Notice of Motion ....................................... X Cross-Motion ........... ,., .................................. X Affirmation in Opposition ......................... X Reply Affirmation ...................................... XX Memorandum of Law................................. X Reply Memorandum of Law ....................... X 1 [* 2] BORN TO BUILD LLC v SALEH, et al Index no. 002345/11 Motion by plaintiff Born To Build LLC for leave to renew and reargue defendant Kamel Saleh's motion to vacate the levy and sheriffs sale is denied. Cross-motion by defendant Kamel Saleh for restitution, including return of the property, is denied, with leave to renew as to the 23-62 Steinway Street property upon notice to the Gregory Kalikas Revocable Trust. This is a special proceeding to determine adverse claims to real property which was sold to satisfy a money judgment. The underlying action is for breach of construction contracts covering projects at 30-63 Steinway Street in Astoria, 38-16 220 1h Street in Bayside, and 1141 Broadway in Manhattan. Plaintiff Born to Build LLC named as a defendant Ibrahim Saleh, also known as Kamel Saleh, apparently understanding that Ibrahim and Kamel were the same person. Justice Warshawsky entered a default judgment against defendant Ibrahim Saleh in the amount of $3 ,563 ,307 .5 8 on May 24, 2011. In granting the default judgment, Justice Warshawsky found that defendant Ibrahim Saleh was a party to the contracts covering the Astoria arid Bayside projects and was liable on the contract covering the Manhattan project on a "piercing the corporate veil" theory. Justice Warshawsky severed the claims against the remaining defendants, emphasizing that his decision was not on the merits with respect to the other parties. The underlying action, aside from the present proceeding, has been assigned to Justice De Stefano. On May 31, 2011, plaintiff Born to Build issued three writs of execution. to the New York City Marshall in an effort to enforce the default judgment. The writs of execution named as garnishees the limited liability company holding title to the Astoria property, as well as the limited liability companies holding title to two other properties, 3 54 E l l 61h Street in Manhattan and 23-62 Steinway Street in Astoria. In the writs of execution, Born to Build alleged that the garnishees were indebted to the judgment debtor Ibrahim Saleh or that the judgment debtor had a membership interest in the garnishees. By order to show cause dated June 9, 2011, defendant Kamel Saleh, who is Ibrahim's brother, moved pursuant to CPLR § 5239 to vacate the levies on the three properties. Kamel argued that the levies were invalid because Ibrahim Saleh had no interest in the limited liability companies which held legal title to the properties. In opposition, Born to Build argued that Ibrahim, the judgment debtor, was the beneficial owner because he exercised dominion and control over the properties. At the hearing on the motion to vacate, Born to Build's owner, George Hourani, testified that Ibrahim admitted to him that he put the properties in Kamel' s name because Ibrahim could not own property personally (Plaintiffs ex K at 175-76). Although Kamel appeared through counsel, he was not present at the hearing. By order dated November 28, 2011, this court denied the motion to vacate and upheld the levies. 2 [* 3] BORN TO BUILD LLC v SALEH, et al Index no. 002345/11 On December 22, 2011, the New York City Marshall conducted a sale of Ibrahim Saleh's purported interest in the limited liability companies holding title to the properties. Born to Build purchased Ibrahim's purpoi;ted interests at the Marshall's sale and proceeded to act as the owner of the properties. By notice of motion dated October 10,2012, defendant Kamel Saleh moved for relief from the order denying his motion to va~ate the levies. Kamel asserted that because he provided the funds to purchase the properties; they should not have been sold to satisfy the judgment against his brother. By order dated February 22, 2013, the court granted defendant Kamel Saleh's motion to vacate the levy and Marshall's sale with respect to Kamel' s interests in the limited liability companies holding title to the 354 E J16th Street and 23-62 Steinway Street properties. A sheriffs sale is void if the judgment debtor has no right, title, or interest in the property subjectto the levy (Herman v Sigmund, 102 AD2d 810 [2d Dept 1984]). Nevertheless, under CPLR § 5239, the court has plenary jurisdiction to determine whether a third party's claim of ownership has been interposed as a sham in order to frustrate enforcement of the judgment (Matter o(Equilease Corp., 19 AD2d 19 [P1 Dept 1963]; McKinney's Practice Commentary C5239:2). Born to Build did not establish that the properties were fraudulently conveyed by the judgment debtor or that title was held by Kamel Saleh as a sham to frustrate enforcement of the judgment. Moreover, since the writs of execution named the legal title holders as garnishees, Born to Build was clearly not misled as to the owner of the properties. However, the court denied the motion to vacate the levy and sheriffs sale as to 30-63 Steinway Street in Astoria. Because 30-63 Steinway Street was one of the properties covered by the construction contracts, Born to Build had reason to believe that the judgment debtor had a membership interest in the limited liability company which held legal title to that property. Born to Build moves for leave to renew and reargue defendant Kamel Saleh' s motion to vacate the levies tot~e extent that the court granted the motion as to the 354 El l61h Street and 23-62 Steinway Street properties. Defendant Kamel Saleh cross moves for restitution, including rescission of a deed of the Steinway Street property from Born to Build to the Gregory Kalikas Revocable Trust. The deed is dated June 15, 2012. According to Kamel, the East l l 61h Street property is in foreclosure. CPLR § 523 9 provides that any interested person may commence a special proceeding to determine rights in the property prior to its application by the sheriff to the satisfaction of a judgment. However, CPLR § 5240 provides that the court may "at any time" regulate or modify any enforcement procedure. Thus, CPLR § 5240 implies that the court may restore property to its rightful owner, even after a sheriffs sale, if the judgment debtor had no interest in the property. In any event, Kamel commenced this proceeding to determine 3 [* 4] BORN TO BUILD LLC v SALEH, et al Index no. 002345/11 adverse claims prior to the sheriffs sale. Born to Build has not established that the court overlooked or misapprehended any matter of fact or law in deciding the prior motion ( CPLR 2221[d]). Accordingly, plaintiff Born To Build's motion for leave to renew and reargue defendant Kamel Saleh's motion tovacate the levy and sheriffs sale is denied. After a sheriffs sale has been consummated, the interests .of persons other than the judgment debtor and creditor are implicated (Guardian Loan Co. v Earlv, 47 NY2d 515, 520 [1979]). Thus, CPLR § 5240 does not permit the judgment debtor, or his nominee, to undo the execution sale and take the property back from a bona fide purchaser, i.e. one having no relationship to the parties (Id). Nevertheless, CPLR § 2003 provides that the court may, within one year of the sale, set aside the execution sale for failure to comply with the CPLR requirements as to "notice, time, or manner of such sale.~' Additionally, the court has inherent equitable power over a sale made pursuant to.itsjudgment to relieve oppressive or unfair conduct or to ensure the sale is not made an instrument ofinjustice (Id at 520-21). Nevertheless, this power should be used sparingly and with great caution (Id). Defendant Kamel Saleh' s motion to vacate the execution sale was made within one year of the sale. The court notes that the execution sale was based upon a default judgment. Moreover, plaintiffs claim that the judgment debtor is the beneficial owner has been discredited, at least with respect to the 1141 Broadway property (See Born to Build v 1141 Realty, 105 AD3d 425 [l5t Dept 2013]). Nevertheless, defendant Kamel makes no showing that the grantee, the Gregory Kalikas trust, is related to the judgment creditor~ Accordingly, defendant Kamel Saleh's cross-motion for restitution, including return of the· property, is denied, with leave to renew as to the 23-62 Steinway Street property, upon notice to the Gregory Kalikas Revocable Trust. In view of the pendency of the foreclosure action, defendant's motion for restitution as to the East 116th Street propertyis denied. So ordered. JUL 1 l 20t3 ENTERED JUL 15 2013 NA~~"'u i.,;vuN IV COUJ.JTY Cll!RK'S O,FfCE 4

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.