Schlesinger v N.P. Agency
Annotate this Case
Download PDF
Schlesinger v N.P. Agency 2013 NY Slip Op 32616(U) May 3, 2013 Sup Ct, NY County Docket Number: 800054/10 Judge: Donna M. Mills Cases posted with a "30000" identifier, i.e., 2013 NY Slip Op 30001(U), are republished from various state and local government websites. These include the New York State Unified Court System's E-Courts Service, and the Bronx County Clerk's office. This opinion is uncorrected and not selected for official publication. SCANNED ON 5/9/2013 [* 1] ',,I', SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE O_F NEW YORK-· NEW ¥ORI>.' COUNTY PIU~SENT: DONNA M. MILLS PART. 58 -~--- Justice JAMFS ,')'CHf,FSI NG ER, INDEX Plainti11~ Nli. 800054/10 . MOTION DATE_ _ _ -vMOTION SEQ. No. MOTION CAL _._,~,r--- D 3 No. N.P. AGENCY, ct al., Defendants. The following papers, numbered 1 to - - - were read on this motion for p APERS NrnvlBERED Notice of Motion/Order to Show Cause-Affidavits- Exhibits .... _ _ j __ Answering Affidavits---- Exhibits ____________.~. ·-·----- ____3_ Replying Affidavits_ _ _ _ _ _~--- FILED CROSS-.MOTION: Upon the foregoing papers, it is ordered that this motion is: MAY 09 2013 DEC!Dlm IN ACCORDANCE WITH ATTACHED ORDER. ~ ,, Dated: /i Check one: COUNTY CLERK'S OFFICE NEW YORK FINAL DISPOSITION ~ ~11\'16.,MU..fit,,_JiSi..C. V NON-FINAL DlSPOSlTTON [* 2] SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK COUNTY OF NEW YORK: PART 58 ------------------------------------------------x JAMES SCHLESINGER, Plaintiff, Index No.: 800054/10 -againstDECISION f\LED N.P. AGENCY, NP. AGENCY INC., et al., MAY O'd 201'3 Defendants. -------------------------------------------------x COUNTY CLERK'S Off \CE DONNA MILLS, J.: NEW YORK In the motion before the Court, defendants move, pursuant to CPLR 3108, for an open commission to conduct oral deposition of Kathie Schlesinger in the State of Massachusetts. Defendants also seek to strike the complaint and/or preclude plaintiff from making claims due to a failure to produce authorizations to obtain certain records of the plaintiff. Plaintiff does not oppose that branch of the motion seeking an open commission, but opposes the striking and or preclusion of its claims. This case involves a claim for negligence and nursing malpractice. Plaintiff alleges that he was injured as a result of the negligent, reckless and careless conduct of the defendants. On November 6, 2012, defendants served a Demand for Authorizations seeking certain information with respect to matrimonial matters and legal file between plaintiff and his former spouse. On December 4, 2012, plaintiff responded to defendants' Demand for Authorizations by objecting to the demands for matrimonial records and legal file as irrelevant and privileged. [* 3] CPLR 3101 (a) provides for, inter alia, "full disclosure of all matter material and necessary in the prosecution or defense of an action." Although the phrase "material and necessary" must be "interpreted liberally" in favor of disclosure so long as the information sought meets the test of "usefulness and reason" (Allen v Crowell-Collier P_LJ.bl. Co, 21 NY2d 403, 406 [1968]; a party does not have the right to uncontrolled an unfettered disclosure (see Merkos L'lnyonei Chinuch ¢. Inc. v Sharf, 59 AD3d 408, 410 [2009]). Further, the Supreme Court has broad discretion over the supervision of disclosure, and its determination will not be disturbed absent an improvident exercise of discretion (see Spodek v Neiss, 70 AD3d 810 [2010]). While plaintiff claims the accident in the underlying action is a proximate cause for his divorce from Ms. Schlesinger, no documentation suggesting such has been provided to date. At this time, this Court is going to deny the request for matrimonial records and legal files until after the deposition of Ms. Schlesinger. After the deposition, if plaintiff continues to claim that the accident at the defendants premises proximately caused his divorce, the Court will entertain a renewed motion to compel. Plaintiffs' motion seeking an open commission of Kathie Schlesinger is granted without opposition. Accordingly it is ORDERED that, pursuant to CPLR 3108, a commission issue in this action to a Justice of the District Court, State of California, or any other authorized person who may administer oaths pursuant to the laws of that state, to take the deposition upon oral questions of Kathie Schlesinger, of 9255 Doheny Road Apt. 1106, West Hollywood, California as witness on behalf of plaintiff [defendant] in this action and that he [she] 2 [* 4] return the transcript of the testimony subscribed by the witness, certified to be correct, annexed to said commission, with any exhibits produced and proved before him [her], to the Clerk of the Supreme Court of the State of New York, County of New York, 60 Centre Street, New York, New York, by certified or registered mail, with all convenient speed; and it is further ORDERED that defendants shall provide the court with an open commission form for the nonparty, nonresident noted above for the court's signature within 10 days of serving plaintiff's counsel of notice of entry of this order; and it is further ORDERED that defendants' motion to strike or preclude is denied with leave to renew; and it is further ORDERED that counsel are directed to appear for a status conference in Room ,, 574,111CentreStreet,on ! , , /"\. .~t11 1 l:o/ /C· · ' ----,---·-----·---·-·2013,at ··-··--·--·--·-"--·AM. f\LED I Dated: 1-. :.i .. ·' _/ I' l 'J 1 ,/ ---~-- ENTER: Mf\'{ o'd 2nu Donna Mills, J.S.C. OONNA M, MILLS~ .J.S.C. 3
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
