New York Athletic Club of the City of N.Y. v Florio

Annotate this Case

Download PDF

New York Athletic Club of the City of N.Y. v Florio 2013 NY Slip Op 31882(U) August 9, 2013 Sup Ct, New York County Docket Number: 159314/2012 Judge: Eileen A. Rakower Republished from New York State Unified Court System's E-Courts Service. Search E-Courts (http://www.nycourts.gov/ecourts) for any additional information on this case. This opinion is uncorrected and not selected for official publication. [*FILED: NEW YORK COUNTY CLERK 08/12/2013 1] INDEX NO. 159314/2012 NYSCEF DOC. NO. 26 RECEIVED NYSCEF: 08/12/2013 SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK - NEW YORK COUNTY PRESENT: Hon. PART 15 EILEEN A. RAKOWER Justice NEW YORK ATHLETIC CLUB OF THE CITY OF NEW YORK. 159314/2012 INDEX NO. Plaintiff. MOTION DATE MOTION SEQ. NO. -v - DANIEL FLORIO AND AMBASSADOR FUEL AND OIL BURNER CORP . ¢ MOTION CAL. NO. 001 Defendants. The following papers. numbered 1 to _ _ were read on this motion for/to PAPERS NUMBERED Notice of Motion/ Order to Show Cause - Affidavits - Exhibits ... 1 Answer - 2 Affidavits - Exhibits _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ __ Replying Affidavits _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ __ 1---- AMENDED ORDER Plaintiff New York Athletic Club of the City of New York, Inc. ("NYAC") brings this motion pursuant to CPLR §602(a) to consolidate its action with two currently pending actions "arising out of the same facts and circumstances. II Defendant Ambassador Fuel and Oil Burner Corp. (" Ambassador Fuel") does not oppose the motion to consolidate the pretrial proceedings of the actions, but moves to reserve its right to apply for separate trials of the actions pursuant to CPLR §603 and CPLR R §4011 following the completion of discovery, to the extent separate trials will avoid prejudice and confusion of the issues. NY AC owns and operates a Marina located at 31 Shore Road, Pelham Manor, New York. On May 17,2012, a fired erupted aboard Defendant Daniel Florio's ("Florio") motor yacht Carole Jaye ("Carole Jaye") which was located in NYAC's boat yard. The fire extended beyond the limits of the Carole Jaye, allegedly causing fire, smoke and soot damage to the premises of NYAC and other [* 2] neighboring boats. NY AC brought the first action before this court on December 28, 2012, New York Athletic Club of the City of New York v. Daniel Florio and Ambassador Fuel and Oil Burner Corp. (Index No. 159314/2012) asserting that the damage to NYAC's property was caused by the negligence of Defendants Florio and Ambassador Fuel (collectively, "Defendants") and for indemnity and contribution against Defendants. The second action before this court, commenced on January 18, 2013, Ciro Galano and The Northern Assurance Company ofAmerica v. Daniel Florio, Ambassador Fuel and Oil Burner Corp, Jose Frietes and John Does 1, 2 and 3, (Index No. 15056112013) seeks to recover for damages to Ciro Galano's yacht as a result of the May 17, 2012 Carole Jaye fire. The complaint alleges that the fire was caused by the negligence of Florio, Ambassador Fuel, and Ambassador Fuel employee Jose Frietes. Additionally, Galano's subrogee insurer, The Northern Assurance Company of America, also seeks damages as a result of the fire. The third action before this court, commenced on January 30, 2013, New Hampshire Insurance Company as subrogee ofFrank Taubner and all other named insureds under policy number YM083324100 and as subrogree ofFletcher Duke and all other named insureds under policy number SA-532-95-25 v. Ambassador Fuel and Oil Burner Corp., Daniel Florio and New York Athletic Club of the City ofNew York, (Index No. 150888/2013) seeks to recover for damages for the damage to the vessels owed by Frank Taubner and Fletcher Duke as a result of the May 17,2012 Carole Jaye fire. This action alleges that the fire was caused by the alleged negligence of Florio, Ambassador Fuel and NY AC. CPLR §602(a) gives the trial court discretion to consolidate actions involving common questions of law or fact. There is a preference for consolidation in the interest of judicial economy and ease of decision-making where there are common questions of law and fact, unless the party opposing the motion demonstrates that consolidation will prejudice a substantial right. (Progressive Ins. Co. v. Vasquez, 10 AD3d 518,782 NYS2d 21 [1st Dept 2004]). Additionally, CPLR §603 gives the trial court discretion to sever trials of any claim or issue in the interest of convenience or to avoid prejudice. The court's discretion should be exercised sparingly, and is inappropriate where the claims 2 [* 3] involve common factual and legal issues. (Lelekakis v. Kamamis, 41 A.D.3d 662, 839 N.Y.S.2d 773 [2nd Dept 2007]). Severance "increases litigation and places an unnecessary burden on the court facilities by requiring two separate trials instead of one." (Shanley v. Callanan Indus., 54 N.Y.2d 52, 429 N.E.2d 104,444 N.Y.S.2d 585 [1981]). All three claims arise out of the same incident, the fire aboard the Carole Jaye on May 17,2012, and seek recovery of damages for vessel damage as a result thereof. All actions involve common questions of law, regarding whether any of the Defendants were negligent and whether Defendants shall indemnify Plaintiff pursuant to the Storage Agreement for claims asserted against it resulting from the fire. The actions are not in different procedural stages, since discovery has not commenced, depositions have not yet been taken, and there would not be undue delay or confusion caused by consolidation. Defendant does not oppose the motion to consolidate the pretrial proceedings in these actions and has not indicated that it will be prejudiced following the completion of discovery. Moreover, it would not further convenience to order separate trials of actions involving common factual and legal questions. Wherefore, it is hereby, ORDERED that the motion is granted and the above-captioned action is consolidated in this Court with Ciro Galano and The Northern Assurance Company ofAmerica v. Daniel Florio, Ambassador Fuel and Oil Burner Corp, Jose Frietes and John Does 1, 2 and 3, and New Hampshire Insurance Company as subrogee ofFrank Taubner and all other named insureds under policy number YM083324100 and as subrogree ofFletcher Duke and all other named insureds under policy number SA-532-95-25 v. Ambassador Fuel and Oil Burner Corp., Daniel Florio and New York Athletic Club of the City ofNew York, under Index Number 159314/2012, and the consolidated action shall bear the following caption: NEW YORK ATHLETIC CLUB OF THE CITY OF NEW YORK 3 Index No. 159314/2012 [* 4] Plaintiff, -againstDANIEL FLORIO AND AMBASSADOR FUEL AND OIL BURNER CORP., Defendants. CIRO GALANO AND THE NORTHERN ASSURANCE COMPANY OF AMERICA, Plaintiff, -againstDANIEL FLORIO, AMABSSADOR FUEL AND OIL BURNER CORP., JOSE FRIETES AND JOHN DOES 1, 2, AND 3 Defendants. NEW HAMPSHIRE INSURANCE COMPANY, AS SUBROGEE OF FRANKTAUBNERAND ALL OTHER NAMED INSUREDS UNDER POLICY NUMBER YM083324100 AND AS SUBROGEE OF FLETCHER DUKE AND ALL OTHER NAMED INSUREDS UNDER POLICY NUMBER SA-532-95-25 Plaintiffs, -againstAMBASSADOR FUEL AND OIL BURNER CORP., DANIEL FLORIO AND NEW YORK ATHLETIC CLUB OF THE CITY OF NEW YORK, Defendants. 4 [* 5] And it is further, ORDERED that the pleadings in the actions hereby consolidated shall stand as the pleadings in the consolidated action; and it is further, ORDERED that the parties shall appear for a preliminary conference at 80 Centre Street, Room 327 on July 30, 2013 at 9:30 a.m.; and it is further, ORDERED that movant is directed to serve a copy of this order with notice of entry on the County Clerk (Room 141 B), who shall consolidate the papers in the actions hereby consolidated and shall mark his records to reflect the consolidation; and it is further, ORDERED that movant is directed to serve a copy of this order with notice of entry on the Clerk of the Trial Support Office (Room 158), who is hereby directed to mark the court's records to reflect the consolidation. This constitutes the decision and order of the court. All other relief requested is denied. Dated: August 9, 2013 HOM. EILEEN A. MKoW@Pi· --Check one: FINAL DISPOSITION X NON-FINAL DISPOSITION Check if appropriate: D DO NOT POST 5 D REFERENCE

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.