Kapcio v Pipeline Constr. Corp.

Annotate this Case
Download PDF
Kapcio v Pipeline Constr. Corp. 2011 NY Slip Op 32605(U) October 5, 2011 Supreme Court, New York County Docket Number: 106313/2009 Judge: Jane S. Solomon Republished from New York State Unified Court System's E-Courts Service. Search E-Courts (http://www.nycourts.gov/ecourts) for any additional information on this case. This opinion is uncorrected and not selected for official publication. [* 1] I I SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK - NEW YORK COUNTY PRESENT: PART . I rre+Lo II 5. * Index Number : 10631312009 INDEX NO. KAPCIO, ROSEANNE 71 MOTION DATE vs. PIPELINE CONSTRUCTION CORP ! SEQUENCE NUMBER : 003 MOTtON SEQ. NO. MOTION CAL. NO. - SUMMARYA JUDGMENT thh motion to/for Notice of Motion/ Order to Show Csums .. E 0 Answering Affidavit8 v) Cross-Motion: - Exhlblts Replying Affldsvhs 3 - Affldavitr - Exhfbtta ... pc Yes No Upon the foregoing papers, it Is ordered that thlr motion FILED :heck one: 0 FINAL DISPQSITJON u fi a Check if appropriate: DO NOT POST REFERENCE SUBMIT ORDER/ JUDG. 0 SETTLE ORDER/ JUDG. n \ [* 2] P:La:~ntifl, -aqa.ins 1.- OCT 06 2011 NEW YORK COUNTY CLERK'S OFFICE SOLOMON, J . : + - r i p p e d a n d C e l l on a sidcwalk on S e c o n d ,'\venue lin M a n h a t t a n . She commenced J awsui trs L h t ~ were conso I i d a t e d t Consolidatud F:dison O F New Y o r k , 'Lnc. I n t h e above index Principally at issue here is t h e s t a t i u s of a c r o s s - c l a i m by d e f e n d a n t V e r i z v r i N e w Y o r k , t h a t her c l a i m h a s b e a n s e i , t l e d b y the h a s i.nEormed t h e COIJIL non-muvi.ng d c f c n d a n t s , and s h e no l o n g e r h a s ariy role i n this i2wssi L . Veri.zo:i moved ¬ o r s u m m a r y j u d g m e n t d i s m : i s s i . n g t h e cornp1air.t 2 s a g a . i n s t c 1 a! ~ r ? aya I.:-, and for summary -judgment:on iLs cross- i ris t. P iipe 1 L r i e sounding i ri common -aw a n d cvntraccual indctnnific:al;j.on. Verizon a l s o seeks to v a c a t e Kapcio'5 note of [* 3] i.ssuc, a n d 1.0 c:ompa.I. Pipe.1. i ne to a p p c a r - L o r a c f e p o s i t : i o n . f i . p ~ : i : e r r i o v c s s e p a r a t e 1 y For :;urrLmary judclmcnl. di.smLssi.r.q thc? i: cmpLi.,.irit tir!d a l l cross-cla-i.rns a q a i n s t it. T3ot:h m o t i o n s for summary j u d y m e f i t dismissing the zomy,,y.a.i.nt, a r c g r a n t e d w . i t h u u t opposition. s c ; ( ? k i n g :c .: PYC? VDC~::~: Thai. park of V e r i z o n s [.tie n o t - c :f :issue 5.s d e n i e d a s moot because, , t h o u q h Knpc.io s e r v e d a no1.e of i.ssiie on V e r i z o n , a p p n r e r i t 1 . y n e v e ~ l-ilecl . i . t , arid i . k W A S r!ot she s e r v e d on P i p c . l . i n e . Jet-. z o n hi15 !:cur ~ r o s s - c l a i iims aq.ij: nst: i .i.pUl i x e : con:.r.; SLAY,. ! c i r i , (:oii!tnori indcxniflc:;iti.on, 1iiw 1.ndc:rnn-i . I . i . c : a t ion, cont:racLua.y and b r e a c h of contz act a r . i s i n g fr-om an zliegcd !,.z! I,u-ce L o procure .1nsuranc:c n a m i n g V c r i z o r i as a n additional insureu O:I t h e p o l i c y ( s e e Ver-izon Ct-oss Claims Against I- ipeli.nc, A f f . Of NaLthew S . M a t e r a , E s q . , Fxh. C ) . V w i z o n hi .red Pipelins pursuant t.o a n as o r d e r e d conI..~ac:I. s p s n n i n g li:i.vo y c a rs ( C o n t ra(;L , Mal,ern AES. , Exh - G ), m e a n i n g tnzt V c r l z o n w o u l d send P i p e l i . n e work o r d e r s to p e r f o r m spc~:i:Lc [ : a s k s d u r i r i q Lhu t e r m 01 t h e i r a g r e e m e n t , a n d t h e Cor:Lra(:~. S::L !.orL.t! Lhe c:onri i.t,ions oI: t . h c i r e n y a g e r n c n t . Paragraph 2 2 1 of Lhc Contract: p r o v i d e s t h a L Pipeline a g r e e s to indeXnnJ. Py Vc2rizon for l o s s e s , damages ( i n c l u d i n g r e a s o n a b l e attorney s ic-:es), iicfb-i.liLi.es or cl.a.ims t h a t may be a . r e s u l t of Pipeline s zck2sa> o r a.i../cgcd a c t s or o m i s s i o n s . P i p e l i n e a . l s o warranLied i t s work to be free 0.L defeCLs 1o.r f i v e y e a r s a l t e r : its [* 4] 42.3). Contract: states , L h a t P.i.pelsne 1 i a b i l it;y jnsurancc, piiragrrip5. 7 4 . 3 , 2r.d u n d e r PJ.pcli.ne is rcquir-ed to h a v e V e r i t o n named a s an addition3 1 insured on the p o l i c y . Kapc.i.0 a l l e g e s that s h e tripped and f e l l whilG crossirIg the sidch!:al.k on h c r w a y to a stL0i-e to buy a l o t t e r y LizksL - S h e fe.11. approximat.c?!.y r e s t-.au.rant knvwn as "Nomad", di S::GVCJ:\I, f i v e feel: ¬ram the entl:a_rlce t o a l o c a t e d at 7E Second A v e n u e , iri i 1. h a s Ic-!;~c:~c:d !.ha\., cme yc>3r k e f o r c ? the a c c i o e n t , P i p e ! i n c h z d pcr.-Lormccl work [,orVcriLon t h a t i n v o . t v e d d i g g i n g tlp arid r e p 1 . a c i n g four s i d e w a l k f l a g s , and installing a "fishplate" LKior: which a Vcri.i..on p h o n c b0ol.h w a s i n s t a l l e d . T h i s w o r k was done a p p r o x l m a t e . l y fi.PI:y ¬ c e t from t h e spo: where Kapcio ¬4.1. I L is c l e a r t h a t she was not caused to f a l l by this work, so rc:i.-Lhpr Veri.zor! a o r P . i p a l .Lac c a n be s x ~ e e z s o n , V o r . i zcri is n o t r I. lab1 e cnL ~ : i i c : d LO K n p c i o . Yor t h c Lo c o r i t r i b u t i o n or carrrLon l a w inciernni F i c a . t i o n f coni P - i . p e l i n e , because P i p e l i n e ' s c o n d u c t was ;r- :IO w a y -c:spons3ble ixt:e:it..LaL -1 Lab: Li.I.y Tar Kapc:io's i n - j u r y , or for Vcrizon's to he.^. Vecizon contends t h a t it is n o n e t h e l e s s entitled to concractual indemnification and coverage as an additional i n s u r e d OIE L1ipe.l i.nc' .s .insurance p o l l c y . a L :c:m(?y f'ccs and I:t Veri.zon wa:its t i qa t.i.ori e x p e n s o . to recover its [* 5] 4 [* 6] 5 [* 7] Enter : NEW YORK COUNTY CLERK'S OFFICE 6

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.