Rangon v Skillman Ave. Corp.
Annotate this CaseDecided on June 3, 2010
Supreme Court, Kings County
Line Viviane Rangon, Plaintiff,
against
Skillman Avenue Corp., Lal C. Sani and First Pioneer Properties, Inc., Defendants.
37311/07
Attorneys for Plaintiff
Mark R. Mauser, Esq.
Dinkes & Schwitzer, PC
112 Madison Avenue
New York, NY 10016
(212) 683-3800
Attorneys for Defendant
Christopher B. Hitchcock, Esq.
Hitchcock & Cummings
757 Third Avenue, 25th Floor
New York, NY 10017
(212) 688-3025
Francois A. Rivera, J.
By notice of motion filed on September 3, 2009, under motion sequence
number seven, defendants Skillman Avenue Corp. and First Pioneer Properties, Inc. (hereinafter
the movants) jointly move pursuant to CPLR § 3212 for an order granting summary
judgment in their favor on liability and dismissing the complaint. Plaintiff Line Viviane Rangon
opposes the motion.
BACKGROUND
On October 9, 2007, plaintiff commenced the instant action by filing a summons and verified complaint with the Kings County Clerk's office. By verified answer dated [*2]November 26, 2007, the movants joined issue. By so-ordered stipulation, dated March 17, 2008, plaintiff discontinued the instant action against Lal C. Sani with prejudice. Thus, the movants are the only remaining defendants in this action. On July 8, 2009, plaintiff filed a note of issue.
Plaintiff brings this action for damages to recover for personal injuries allegedly sustained during a fall down a set of stairs located at 33-02 Skillman Avenue, Long Island City, New York. Skillman Avenue Corp. is the owner of the premises. The complaint alleges that First Pioneer Properties, Inc. is the manager of the premises. The complaint alleges forty seven allegations of fact in support of three causes of action. The first cause of action is against Skillman Avenue Corp., the second is against Lal C. Sani and the third is against First Pioneer Properties, Inc. The movants' verified answer asserts eleven affirmative defenses.
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.