Mount Vernon Hosp. Radiology v McGuire
Annotate this CaseDecided on November 2, 2009
Mount Vernon City Court
Mount Vernon Hospital Radiology, Plaintiff,
against
Darren McGuire, Defendant.
1813-09
Samuel L. Newman, Esq.
Attorney for Plaintiff
20 Squadron Blvd., Suite 540
New City, New York 10956
Darren McGuire
Defendant Pro Se
50 Foster Avenue
Mount Vernon, New York 10550
Adam Seiden, J.
In this action to recover the balance due for medical services rendered, plaintiff moves for an Order granting leave to file the affidavit of service of the Summons and Complaint in the instant matter nunc pro tunc as of the date of service.
The plaintiff allegedly extended credit to defendant for medical care it provided to him. The defendant allegedly owes a balance of $1,548.00. Plaintiff commenced the instant action on April 10, 2009. Subsequently, plaintiff served the Summons and Complaint pursuant to CPLR § 308(4) on defendant on June 10, 2009, however, the affidavit of service was never filed with the Court. Plaintiff's counsel alleges in the moving papers that he never received an original affidavit of service until August 4, 2009. Plaintiff seeks an Order from this Court permitting the plaintiff to file the affidavit service of the Summons and Complaint nunc pro tunc as of the date of service, that being June 10, 2009.
The failure to file a timely proof of service is a mere irregularity without jurisdictional implications that may be cured by an order pursuant to CPLR §§ 2001 and 2004. Weininger v. Sassower, 204 AD2d 715 (2nd Dept. 1994); Rosato v. Ricciardi, 174 AD2d 937 (3rd Dept. 1991). However, a court cannot invoke the device of nunc pro tunc to effectively grant a default judgment retroactively. Id.
In the case at bar, granting plaintiff permission to file the affidavit of service nunc pro tunc as of June 10, 2009 would be in effect granting a default judgment retroactively as defendant's time to answer would have expired on June 30, 2009. As such, the Court grants plaintiff's motion for leave to file its affidavit of service, however, the Court deems it timely served as of the date of this decision. The defendant has twenty (20) days from the date of this decision within which to serve his answer.
This constitutes the Decision and Order of this Court.
The Court considered the following papers on this motion: Ex Parte Motion dated August 6,
2009; Exhibit A.
Dated:November 2, 2009
[*2]
Mount Vernon, New York
__________________________________
HON. ADAM SEIDEN
Associate City Judge of Mount Vernon
To:
Samuel L. Newman, Esq.
Attorney for Plaintiff
20 Squadron Blvd., Suite 540
New City, New York 10956
Darren McGuire
Defendant Pro Se
50 Foster Avenue
Mount Vernon, New York 10550
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.