Calderazzo v Houston Essex Realty Corp.
Annotate this CaseDecided on October 28, 2007
Supreme Court, New York County
Edward Calderazzo, Plaintiff,
against
Houston Essex Realty Corp., et al., Defendants.
116236/2004
For Plaintiff:
Norman R. Colon, Esq.
209-45 26th Avenue, Suite 1B
Bay Terrace, New York 11360
(718) 279-6086
For Defendants Houston Essex Realty and Tony Lai:
Debra J. Millman, Esq.
302 Fifth Avenue, 8th Floor
New York, New York 10001
(212) 407-4700
For Defendants R&S Security and Robert Amos:
Harms, Mahon, Finneran, Gialleonardo & Whelan, Esqs.
One Whitehall Street
New York, New York 10004
(212) 248-9100
Michael D. Stallman, J.
Plaintiff alleges that, on November 18, 2001, he was assaulted outside a nightclub known as
Chaos, located at 225 E. Houston Street. Defendant Houston Essex Realty owns the premises,
which is leased to defendant Club Old Banque Corp., which operates the nightclub. Plaintiff
testified at his deposition that, while he and his brother were waiting to enter the nightclub, an
altercation occurred on the sidewalk, several security personnel became involved, and he was
trampled in the melee. Millman Affirm., Ex C [Calderazzo EBT], at 34-35, 93-101).
These defendants establish a prima facie entitlement to summary judgment. If
nothing had transpired within the club to have caused the altercation, then neither the landlord
nor the club owner would have owed a duty under the circumstances to protect plaintiff from the
sudden assault that took place outside the premises. Murphy v Chaos, 26 AD3d 231 (1st Dept 2006); Woolard v
New Mohegan Diner, 258 AD2d 578, 579 (2d Dept 1999). As an out-of-possession landlord
with limited rights of entry (see Millman Affirm., Ex F), Houston Essex Realty owes no
duty of care to prevent an assault outside the premises. See Regina v Broadway-Bronx Motel Co. , 23 AD3d 255, 256 (1st
Dept 2005 [out of possession landlord with limited right of entry not liable for assault occurring
on premises]). Under either scenario, Houston Essex Realty Corp. owes no duty of care to
plaintiff. The security personnel were not employed by Houston Essex Realty Corp. In addition,
there is no basis to hold Tony Lai, a principal of Houston Essex Realty Corp., personally liable
for plaintiff's injuries, even if the landlord owed plaintiff a duty of care here.
Plaintiff fails to raise a triable issue of fact warranting denial of summary judgment.
Plaintiff's contention that Tony Lai is the Tony Theodore who executed the lease on behalf of
Club Old Banque Corp. is based entirely on speculation. Plaintiff's reliance on Section 7-210 of
the Administrative Code of the City of New York is misplaced, as plaintiff himself testified that
his injuries occurred during a melee in front of the nightclub, not due to an allegedly hazardous
condition of the sidewalk. Whether Houston Essex Realty did not procure any insurance that the
law may require is irrelevant.
Given all the above, the Court need not reach the issue of whether the evidence
indicates that plaintiff's own brother started the melee.
/s
Dated: 10/28/07
New York, New YorkJ.S.C.
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.