People v Branch

Annotate this Case
[*1] People v Branch 2006 NY Slip Op 52337(U) [13 Misc 3d 1244(A)] Decided on December 1, 2006 Supreme Court, Kings County McKay, J. Published by New York State Law Reporting Bureau pursuant to Judiciary Law § 431. As corrected in part through December 15, 2006; it will not be published in the printed Official Reports.

Decided on December 1, 2006
Supreme Court, Kings County

The People of the State of New York, Plaintiff,

against

Deshawn Branch A/K/A DESHAWN BRANCH - EL, DEFENDANT.



01963-2005

Joseph Kevin McKay, J.

Defendant has served and filed a pro se CPL 440 motion dated November 20, 2006, claiming his sentence was illegal in two ways: (1) his

determinate sentence of two years should have been an indeterminate sentence;

(2) his post release supervision period of five years should have been a shorter period. For the reasons explained below, the motion is summarily denied.

On July 7, 2005 defendant pled guilty to attempted criminal possession of a weapon in the third degree (Penal Law 110/265.02 [4]). He was sentenced on October 13, 2005 a two year determinate sentence as a second felony offender pursuant to Penal law § 70.06, and five years post-release supervision.

Defendant's present claims rest on the mistaken propositions

that, (1) his conviction was a non-violent felony and (2) that he was sentenced under Penal Law 70.02, entitling him to a post-release supervision period less than

five years. He is wrong on both counts.

First, his conviction is an E violent felony, according to Penal Law 70.02 (1) (d), thereby requiring a determinate , not an indeterminate, sentence. Second, Penal Law 70.45 (2) provides that the period of post-release supervision shall be five years, with certain exceptions not applicable here for sentences imposed pursuant to Penal Law 70.02. Because defendant had a prior non-violent felony conviction, and was adjudicated as a second felony offender, he had to be sentenced pursuant to Penal Law 70.06, which mandates the five year period of post-release supervision.

Accordingly, this motion must be and hereby is DENIED in all respects.

The Clerk of the Court is directed to provide a copy of this Decision and Order by ordinary mail, first class, to defendant DeShawn S. Branch,

DIN No.05-A-5402, Bare Hill Correctional Facility, Caller Box 20, 181 Branch Road, Malone, New York 12953 and to the Kings County District Attorney's [*2]Office, 350 Jay Street, Brooklyn, NY 11201.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

E N T E R,

Joseph Kevin McKay

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.