People v Largo

[*1] People v Largo 2004 NY Slip Op 51837(U) Decided on December 1, 2004 Supreme Court, Queens County Roman, J. Published by New York State Law Reporting Bureau pursuant to Judiciary Law § 431. This opinion is uncorrected and will not be published in the printed Official Reports.

Decided on December 1, 2004
Supreme Court, Queens County

THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK

against

Robert Largo, DEFENDANT



291/97

Sheri S. Roman, J.

Upon the proceedings held in this matter, and in the opinion of the court herein, defendant's application for an order granting defendant poor person relief and permitting defendant to obtain a free transcript of the proceedings in this matter, is denied.

On April 26, 1999, defendant was convicted of Rape in the First Degree, Burglary in the First Degree, Robbery in the Second Degree, Sex Abuse in the First Degree, and Criminal Possession of a Weapon in the Fourth Degree. Defendant was adjudicated a persistent violent felony offender and was sentenced to an aggregate term of incarceration of from forty-five years to life.

Defendant appealed and the conviction was affirmed by the Appellate Division, Second Department by order dated April 9, 2001. See People v. Largo, 282 AD2d 548(2d Dept.2001); leave to appeal denied, 96 NY2d 903(2001). Defendant subsequently moved [*2]before this court to set aside the verdict pursuant to C.P.L. Section 440.10(1)(h). Said motion was denied by this court, by decision and order dated May 23, 2002. Defendant then moved in the Appellate Division, Second Department for a writ of error coram nobis based upon ineffective assistance of appellate counsel which was denied by order dated November 12, 2002. People v. Largo, 299 AD2d 425(2d Dept. 2002). Defendant also moved in Federal District Court for a writ of habeas corpus which was denied by decision and order dated March 4, 2004. See Largo v. Griener, 2004 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 5616.

In the present motion defendant moves for a free copy of the trial transcript stating that a copy of the transcript is necessary to assist in the prosecution of a second motion to vacate the conviction pursuant to C.P.L. Section 440.10.

The court notes, as stated above, that defendant appealed the judgment of conviction in this matter and that said conviction was affirmed by the Appellate Division, Second Department in an order dated April 9, 2001. A copy of the transcript was prepared incidental to that appeal and incidental to the Writ of Habeas Corpus decided on March 4, 2004. The defendant has failed to provide the court with any reason why an additional copy of the transcript is needed to proceed in this court at this time.

In addition, the courts have held that although the Constitution requires that an indigent defendant is entitled to poor person relief as of right for trial and the first appeal, the Constitution does not require that the State provide poor person relief in discretionary appeals or after the initial appeal. Ross v. Moffitt, 417 U.S. 600(1974). The United States Supreme Court has also held that the Constitution does not require that poor person relief be provided for indigent defendants in collateral proceedings. Pennsylvania v. Finley, 481 U.S. 551(1987). A motion made pursuant to C.P.L. Section 440.10 is a collateral proceeding for which a defendant is not entitled to a transcript without cost.

_____________________

Sheri S. Roman, J.S.C.

Dated:December 1, 2004

Gloria D'Amico

Clerk