Dosiak v Javino

Annotate this Case
[*1] Dosiak v Javino 2022 NY Slip Op 51371(U) Decided on December 22, 2022 Appellate Term, Second Department Published by New York State Law Reporting Bureau pursuant to Judiciary Law ยง 431. This opinion is uncorrected and will not be published in the printed Official Reports.

Decided on December 22, 2022
SUPREME COURT, APPELLATE TERM, SECOND DEPARTMENT, 9th and 10th JUDICIAL DISTRICTS
PRESENT: : JERRY GARGUILO, P.J., ELIZABETH H. EMERSON, TIMOTHY S. DRISCOLL, JJ
2022-422 S C

Bennett Dosiak, Respondent,

against

Dale Robert Javino, Appellant.

Dale Robert Javino, appellant pro se. Victor A. Carr & Associates, for respondent (no brief filed).

Appeal from an order of the District Court of Suffolk County, Sixth District (James F. Matthews, J.), dated April 6, 2022. The order denied respondent's motion to vacate a default final judgment of that court entered March 17, 2022 upon respondent's failure to appear at a scheduled hearing in a commercial nonpayment summary proceeding.

ORDERED that the order is reversed, without costs, and respondent's motion to vacate the default final judgment is granted.

In this commercial nonpayment proceeding, respondent appeals from an order of the District Court dated April 6, 2022, which denied his motion to vacate a default final judgment of that court entered March 17, 2022 upon his failure to appear at a scheduled hearing. The final judgment awarded petitioner possession and the sum of $25,500.

Upon a review of the record, we find that respondent established both elements required to prevail on his motion to vacate the final judgment based on excusable default: an reasonable excuse for his default and a potentially meritorious defense to the proceeding (see CPLR 5015 [a] [1]; Eugene Di Lorenzo, Inc. v A.C. Dutton Lbr. Co., 67 NY2d 138, 141 [1986]; Biffer v Alt Floor & Wall Covering, LLC, 65 Misc 3d 151[A], 2019 NY Slip Op 51878[U] [App Term, 2d Dept, 9th & 10th Jud Dists 2019]).

Accordingly, the order is reversed and respondent's motion to vacate the default final [*2]judgment is granted.

GARGUILO, P.J., EMERSON and DRISCOLL, JJ., concur.



ENTER:
Paul Kenny
Chief Clerk
Decision Date: December 22, 2022

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.