Flatbush Chiropractic, P.C. v Omni Indem. Co.

Annotate this Case
[*1] Flatbush Chiropractic, P.C. v Omni Indem. Co. 2022 NY Slip Op 50146(U) Decided on February 18, 2022 Appellate Term, Second Department Published by New York State Law Reporting Bureau pursuant to Judiciary Law ยง 431. This opinion is uncorrected and will not be published in the printed Official Reports.

Decided on February 18, 2022
SUPREME COURT, APPELLATE TERM, SECOND DEPARTMENT, 2d, 11th and 13th JUDICIAL DISTRICTS
PRESENT: : THOMAS P. ALIOTTA, P.J., DAVID ELLIOT, DONNA-MARIE E. GOLIA, JJ
2018-1471 K C

Flatbush Chiropractic, P.C., as Assignee of Emando, Fils-Aime, Respondent,

against

Omni Indemnity Company, Appellant.

Freiberg, Peck & Kang, LLP (Yilo J. Kang of counsel), for appellant. The Rybak Firm, PLLC (Oleg Rybak of counsel), for respondent (no brief filed).

Appeal from an order of the Civil Court of the City of New York, Kings County (Rosemarie Montalbano, J.), entered June 19, 2018. The order, insofar as appealed from, denied defendant's motion for summary judgment dismissing the complaint.

ORDERED that the order, insofar as appealed from, is reversed, with $30 costs, and defendant's motion for summary judgment dismissing the complaint is granted.

In this action by a provider to recover assigned first-party no-fault benefits, defendant appeals from so much of an order of the Civil Court as denied defendant's motion which had sought summary judgment dismissing the complaint on the ground, among others, that the action was barred by the statute of limitations.

For the reasons stated in Vincent Med. Servs., P.C., as Assignee of Gederson Gedeon v Omni Indem. Co. (___ Misc 3d ___, 2022 NY Slip Op ___ [appeal No. 2018-1277 K C], decided herewith), the order, insofar as appealed from, is reversed and defendant's motion for summary judgment dismissing the complaint is granted.

ALIOTTA, P.J., and GOLIA, J., concur.

ELLIOT, J., taking no part.


ENTER:
Paul Kenny
Chief Clerk
Decision Date: February 18, 2022

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.