Silver Acupuncture, P.C. v GEICO (Gov. Employees)

Annotate this Case
[*1] Silver Acupuncture, P.C. v GEICO (Gov. Employees) 2021 NY Slip Op 51163(U) Decided on November 19, 2021 Appellate Term, Second Department Published by New York State Law Reporting Bureau pursuant to Judiciary Law ยง 431. This opinion is uncorrected and will not be published in the printed Official Reports.

Decided on November 19, 2021
SUPREME COURT, APPELLATE TERM, SECOND DEPARTMENT, 2d, 11th and 13th JUDICIAL DISTRICTS
PRESENT: : DAVID ELLIOT, J.P., MICHELLE WESTON, DONNA-MARIE E. GOLIA, JJ
2020-700 K C

Silver Acupuncture, P.C., as Assignee of Laura Brown, Appellant,

against

GEICO (Gov. Employees), Respondent.

Kopelevich & Feldsherova, P.C. (David Landfair of counsel), for appellant. Law Office of Goldstein Flecker & Hopkins (Lawrence J. Chanice of counsel), for respondent.

Appeal from an order of the Civil Court of the City of New York, Kings County (Matthew P. Blum, J.), entered February 21, 2020. The order granted defendant's motion to dismiss the complaint pursuant to CPLR 3216.

ORDERED that the order is affirmed, with $25 costs.

In July 2013, plaintiff commenced this action to recover assigned first-party no-fault benefits. In January 2019, defendant moved pursuant to CPLR 3216 to dismiss the complaint for failure to prosecute the action on the ground that plaintiff had failed to file a notice of trial within 90 days of defendant's service upon plaintiff of a 90-day demand. It is undisputed that a notice of trial was served within the 90-day period, but that it had not been filed. In opposition to the motion, plaintiff's counsel's calendar clerk submitted an affidavit wherein he stated that the failure to file the notice of trial was due to law office failure. Plaintiff's owner and treating acupuncturist submitted an affidavit wherein she stated that plaintiff had a meritorious cause of action. By order entered February 21, 2020, the Civil Court granted defendant's motion.

A similar issue was presented in Silver Acupuncture, P.C. v GEICO Gen. Ins. Co. (72 [*2]Misc 3d 140[A], 2021 NY Slip Op 50833[U] [App Term, 2d Dept, 2d, 11th & 13th Jud Dists 2021]), wherein a nearly identical affidavit from the same calendar clerk was annexed to the plaintiff's opposition papers.

Accordingly, for the reasons stated in Silver Acupuncture, P.C. (2021 NY Slip Op 50833[U]), the order is affirmed (see also Silver Acupuncture, P.C. v GEICO Indem. Co., 69 Misc 3d 128[A], 2020 NY Slip Op 51134[U] [App Term, 2d Dept, 2d, 11th & 13th Jud Dists 2020]).

ELLIOT, J.P., WESTON and GOLIA, JJ., concur.


ENTER:
Paul Kenny
Chief Clerk
Decision Date: November 19, 2021

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.