Ellerby v Helman

Annotate this Case
[*1] Ellerby v Helman 2021 NY Slip Op 50663(U) Decided on July 9, 2021 Appellate Term, Second Department Published by New York State Law Reporting Bureau pursuant to Judiciary Law ยง 431. This opinion is uncorrected and will not be published in the printed Official Reports.

Decided on July 9, 2021
SUPREME COURT, APPELLATE TERM, SECOND DEPARTMENT, 2d, 11th and 13th JUDICIAL DISTRICTS
PRESENT: : THOMAS P. ALIOTTA, P.J., MICHELLE WESTON, DAVID ELLIOT, JJ
2018-2522 K C

Marvin Ellerby, Jr., Respondent,

against

Josef Helman, Appellant.

Berger Fink LLP (David M. Berger of counsel), for appellant. The Howard Law Firm, P.C. (Eric Howard of counsel), for respondent.

Appeal from a decision of the Civil Court of the City of New York, Kings County (Cenceria P. Edwards, J.), dated October 31, 2018, deemed from a final judgment of that court entered October 31, 2018 (see CPLR 5512 [a]). The final judgment, upon the decision, after a nonjury trial, awarded landlord possession in a holdover summary proceeding.

ORDERED that the final judgment is affirmed, without costs.

In June 2018, landlord commenced this commercial holdover proceeding to recover possession of certain parking spaces associated with landlord's residence. After a nonjury trial, the Civil Court awarded landlord possession of the premises. We decline to consider arguments raised for the first time on appeal (see Joe v Upper Room Ministries, Inc., 88 AD3d 963 [2011]). We have reviewed tenant's preserved appellate contentions and find them to be lacking in merit.

Accordingly, the final judgment is affirmed.

ALIOTTA, P.J., WESTON and ELLIOT, JJ., concur.



ENTER:
Paul Kenny
Chief Clerk
Decision Date: July 9, 2021

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.