People v Cadet (Isabel)

Annotate this Case
[*1] People v Cadet (Isabel) 2021 NY Slip Op 50573(U) Decided on June 17, 2021 Appellate Term, Second Department Published by New York State Law Reporting Bureau pursuant to Judiciary Law § 431. This opinion is uncorrected and will not be published in the printed Official Reports.

Decided on June 17, 2021
SUPREME COURT, APPELLATE TERM, SECOND DEPARTMENT, 9th and 10th JUDICIAL DISTRICTS
PRESENT: : JERRY GARGUILO, J.P., ELIZABETH H. EMERSON, TIMOTHY S. DRISCOLL, JJ
2020-612 N C

The People of the State of New York, Respondent,

against

Isabel C. Cadet, Appellant.

Jonathan Rosenberg, PLLC (Jonathan Rosenberg of counsel), for appellant. Nassau County District Attorney (Daniel Bresnahan and Tammy J. Smiley of counsel), for respondent.

Appeal from an order of the District Court of Nassau County, First District (Joseph B. Girardi, J.), dated February 20, 2020. The order denied defendant's motion to seal the record of her judgment of conviction.

ORDERED that the order is affirmed, without costs.

Insofar as relevant to this appeal, defendant pleaded guilty in 2008 to driving while intoxicated (per se) (Vehicle and Traffic Law § 1192 [2]), a misdemeanor. In 2020, defendant moved, pursuant to CPL 160.59, to seal her conviction. The People did not oppose the motion, which the District Court denied without conducting a hearing (see CPL 160.59 [6]). On appeal, defendant contends that the court improvidently exercised its discretion in refusing to seal defendant's conviction of driving while intoxicated.

Upon a review of the record, we find that the District Court did not improvidently exercise its discretion in denying defendant's motion (see CPL 160.59 [4], [7]; People v Shrayef, 181 AD3d 936 [2020]). The court considered the nonexhaustive relevant factors identified in CPL 160.59 (7) to make the discretionary determination that granting defendant's motion to seal the conviction was not warranted, and we find no basis to disturb that determination.

Accordingly, the order is affirmed.

GARGUILO, J.P., EMERSON and DRISCOLL, JJ., concur.


ENTER:
Paul Kenny
Chief Clerk
Decision Date: June 17, 2021

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.