People v Quinones (Luigil)

Annotate this Case
[*1] People v Quinones (Luigil) 2021 NY Slip Op 50227(U) Decided on March 18, 2021 Appellate Term, Second Department Published by New York State Law Reporting Bureau pursuant to Judiciary Law ยง 431. This opinion is uncorrected and will not be published in the printed Official Reports.

Decided on March 18, 2021
SUPREME COURT, APPELLATE TERM, SECOND DEPARTMENT, 9th and 10th JUDICIAL DISTRICTS
PRESENT: : TERRY JANE RUDERMAN, P.J., JERRY GARGUILO, ELIZABETH H. EMERSON, JJ
2019-769 W CR

The People of the State of New York, Respondent,

against

Luigil Quinones, Appellant.

John P. Savoca, for appellant. Westchester County District Attorney, for respondent (no brief filed).

Appeal from a judgment of the Justice Court of the Town of New Castle, Westchester County (Douglas J. Martino, J.), rendered February 26, 2019. The judgment convicted defendant, upon his plea of guilty, of disorderly conduct, and imposed sentence. Assigned counsel has submitted a brief in accordance with Anders v California (386 US 738 [1967]), seeking leave to withdraw as counsel.

ORDERED that the judgment of conviction is affirmed.

Upon an independent review of the record, we conclude that there are no nonfrivolous issues which could be raised on appeal (see Anders v California, 386 US 738 [1967]). Counsel's application for leave to withdraw as counsel is, therefore, granted (see id.; People v Murray, 169 AD3d 227 [2019]; Matter of Giovanni S. [Jasmin A.], 89 AD3d 252 [2011]; People v Paige, 54 AD2d 631 [1976]; cf. People v Gonzalez, 47 NY2d 606 [1979]).

RUDERMAN, P.J., GARGUILO and EMERSON, JJ., concur.


ENTER:
Paul Kenny
Chief Clerk
Decision Date: March 18, 2021

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.