People v Lopez (Jose)

Annotate this Case
[*1] People v Lopez (Jose) 2020 NY Slip Op 50891(U) Decided on July 24, 2020 Appellate Term, Second Department Published by New York State Law Reporting Bureau pursuant to Judiciary Law ยง 431. This opinion is uncorrected and will not be published in the printed Official Reports.

Decided on July 24, 2020
SUPREME COURT, APPELLATE TERM, SECOND DEPARTMENT, 2d, 11th and 13th JUDICIAL DISTRICTS
PRESENT: : MICHELLE WESTON, J.P., DAVID ELLIOT, BERNICE D. SIEGAL, JJ
2017-831 Q CR

The People of the State of New York, Respondent,

against

Jose Lopez, Appellant.

New York City Legal Aid Society (Kristina Schwarz of counsel), for appellant. Queens County District Attorney (John M. Castellano, Johnnette Traill and Anasatsia Spanakos of counsel), for respondent.

Appeal from two judgments of the Criminal Court of the City of New York, Queens County (Ushir Pandit-Durant, J.), rendered March 30, 2017. Each judgment convicted defendant, upon his plea of guilty, of attempted criminal possession of a controlled substance in the seventh degree, and imposed sentence. Assigned counsel has submitted a brief in accordance with Anders v California (386 US 738 [1967]), seeking leave to withdraw as counsel.

ORDERED that the judgments of conviction are affirmed.

We are satisfied with the sufficiency of the brief filed by defendant's assigned counsel pursuant to Anders v California (386 US 738 [1967]), and, upon an independent review of the record, we conclude that there are no nonfrivolous issues which could be raised on appeal. Counsel's application for leave to withdraw as counsel is, therefore, granted (see id.; People v Murray, 169 AD3d 227 [2019]; Matter of Giovanni S. [Jasmin A.], 89 AD3d 252 [2011]; People v Paige, 54 AD2d 631 [1976]; cf. People v Gonzalez, 47 NY2d 606 [1979]).

WESTON, J.P., ELLIOT and SIEGAL, JJ., concur.


ENTER:
Paul Kenny
Chief Clerk
Decision Date: July 24, 2020

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.