Shirom Acupuncture, P.C. v NYCTA-MABSTOA

Annotate this Case
[*1] Shirom Acupuncture, P.C. v NYCTA-MABSTOA 2018 NY Slip Op 51580(U) Decided on November 9, 2018 Appellate Term, Second Department Published by New York State Law Reporting Bureau pursuant to Judiciary Law ยง 431. This opinion is uncorrected and will not be published in the printed Official Reports.

Decided on November 9, 2018
SUPREME COURT, APPELLATE TERM, SECOND DEPARTMENT, 2d, 11th and 13th JUDICIAL DISTRICTS
PRESENT: : MICHAEL L. PESCE, P.J., THOMAS P. ALIOTTA, DAVID ELLIOT, JJ
2015-1245 Q C

Shirom Acupuncture, P.C., as Assignee of Gretcher Casanova, Appellant,

against

NYCTA-MABSTOA, Respondent.

Gary Tsirelman, P.C. (Irena Golodkeyer, of counsel), for appellant. Foley, Smit, O'Boyle & Weisman (Aaron Meyer of counsel), for respondent.

Appeal from a judgment of the Civil Court of the City of New York, Queens County (Larry Love, J.), entered February 11, 2015. The judgment, entered pursuant to an order of that court entered March 6, 2013 granting defendant's motion to dismiss the complaint pursuant to CPLR 3211 (a) (5) and denying plaintiff's cross motion for summary judgment, dismissed the complaint.

ORDERED that the judgment is affirmed, with $25 costs.

In this action by a provider to recover assigned first-party no-fault benefits, defendant moved, pursuant to CPLR 3211 (a) (5), to dismiss the complaint on the ground that the action had been commenced after the expiration of the three-year limitation period of CPLR 214 (2), which, defendant contended, was applicable to self-insurers such as defendant. Plaintiff cross-moved for summary judgment and argued, among other things, that the action is subject to a six-year statute of limitations. By order entered March 6, 2013, the Civil Court granted defendant's motion and implicitly denied plaintiff's cross motion. On February 11, 2015, a judgment was entered dismissing the complaint.

For the reasons stated in Contact Chiropractic, P.C. v New York City Tr. Auth. (31 NY3d 187 [2018]), the judgment is affirmed.

PESCE, P.J., ALIOTTA and ELLIOT, JJ., concur.


ENTER:
Paul Kenny
Chief Clerk
Decision Date: November 09, 2018

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.