Compas Med., P.C. v Citiwide Auto Leasing

Annotate this Case
[*1] Compas Med., P.C. v Citiwide Auto Leasing 2017 NY Slip Op 51241(U) Decided on September 22, 2017 Appellate Term, Second Department Published by New York State Law Reporting Bureau pursuant to Judiciary Law ยง 431. This opinion is uncorrected and will not be published in the printed Official Reports.

Decided on September 22, 2017
SUPREME COURT, APPELLATE TERM, SECOND DEPARTMENT, 2d, 11th and 13th JUDICIAL DISTRICTS
PRESENT: : MICHAEL L. PESCE, P.J., THOMAS P. ALIOTTA, MARTIN M. SOLOMON, JJ
2014-1715 K C

Compas Medical, P.C., as Assignee of Fearon, Lansha, Appellant,

against

Citiwide Auto Leasing, Respondent.

The Rybak Firm, PLLC (Damin J. Toell, Esq.), for appellant. Palmieri, Castiglione & Nightingale, P.C. (Michael S. Nightingale, Esq.), for respondent.

Appeal from an order of the Civil Court of the City of New York, Kings County (Carolyn E. Wade, J.), entered June 16, 2014. The order granted defendant's motion for summary judgment dismissing the complaint.

ORDERED that the order is affirmed, with $25 costs.

In this action by a provider to recover assigned first-party no-fault benefits, defendant moved for summary judgment dismissing six of the causes of action as premature on the ground that plaintiff had failed to provide requested verification as to those claims, and dismissing the remaining cause of action on the ground that plaintiff's assignor had failed to appear for duly scheduled independent medical examinations (IMEs). The Civil Court granted defendant's motion.

Contrary to plaintiff's arguments, defendant's proof was sufficient to demonstrate that it had properly mailed the verification requests, IME scheduling letters and denial of claim form at issue (see St. Vincent's Hosp. of Richmond v Government Empls. Ins. Co., 50 AD3d 1123 [2008]), and that it had not received the verification that it had requested as to the relevant six causes of action.

Accordingly, the order is affirmed.

PESCE, P.J., ALIOTTA and SOLOMON, JJ., concur.


ENTER:
Paul Kenny
Chief Clerk
Decision Date: September 22, 2017

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.