Gentlecare Ambulatory Anesthesia Servs. v Country Wide Ins. Co.

Annotate this Case
[*1] Gentlecare Ambulatory Anesthesia Servs. v Country Wide Ins. Co. 2017 NY Slip Op 51103(U) Decided on August 25, 2017 Appellate Term, Second Department Published by New York State Law Reporting Bureau pursuant to Judiciary Law ยง 431. This opinion is uncorrected and will not be published in the printed Official Reports.

Decided on August 25, 2017
SUPREME COURT, APPELLATE TERM, SECOND DEPARTMENT, 2d, 11th and 13th JUDICIAL DISTRICTS
PRESENT: : THOMAS P. ALIOTTA, J.P., MICHAEL L. PESCE, MARTIN M. SOLOMON, JJ
2016-265 Q C

Gentlecare Ambulatory Anesthesia Services and Lyonel F. Paul, M.D., as Assignees of Stevenson, Connie, Appellants,

against

Country Wide Insurance Company, Respondent.

The Rybak Firm, PLLC (Damin J. Toell, Esq.), for appellants. Jaffe & Koumourdas, LLP (Jean H. Kang, Esq.), for respondent.

Appeal from an order of the Civil Court of the City of New York, Queens County (Terrence C. O'Connor, J), entered December 15, 2015. The order denied plaintiff's motion for summary judgment and granted defendant's cross motion for summary judgment dismissing the complaint.

ORDERED that the order is modified by providing that defendant's cross motion for summary judgment dismissing the complaint is denied; as so modified, the order is affirmed, without costs.

In this action by a provider to recover assigned first-party no-fault benefits, plaintiff appeals from an order of the Civil Court which denied plaintiff's motion for summary judgment and granted defendant's cross motion for summary judgment dismissing the complaint.

For the reasons stated in Island Life Chiropractic, P.C. v Country Wide Ins. Co. (53 Misc 3d 131[A], 2016 NY Slip Op 51378[U] [App Term, 2d Dept, 2d, 11th & 13th Jud Dists 2016]), the order is modified by providing that defendant's cross motion for summary judgment [*2]dismissing the complaint is denied.

ALIOTTA, J.P., PESCE and SOLOMON, JJ., concur.


ENTER:
Paul Kenny
Chief Clerk
Decision Date: August 25, 2017

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.