Sharp View Diagnostic Imaging, P.C. v Maya Assur. Co.

Annotate this Case
[*1] Sharp View Diagnostic Imaging, P.C. v Maya Assur. Co. 2016 NY Slip Op 51534(U) Decided on October 13, 2016 Appellate Term, Second Department Published by New York State Law Reporting Bureau pursuant to Judiciary Law ยง 431. This opinion is uncorrected and will not be published in the printed Official Reports.

Decided on October 13, 2016
SUPREME COURT, APPELLATE TERM, SECOND DEPARTMENT, 2d, 11th and 13th JUDICIAL DISTRICTS
PRESENT: : PESCE, P.J., ALIOTTA and SOLOMON, JJ.
2014-927 K C

Sharp View Diagnostic Imaging, P.C., as Assignee of SHOY SCOTLAND, Appellant,

against

Maya Assurance Company, Respondent.

Appeal from an order of the Civil Court of the City of New York, Kings County (Harriet L. Thompson, J.), entered November 25, 2013. The order granted defendant's motion for summary judgment dismissing the complaint.

ORDERED that the order is reversed, with $30 costs, and defendant's motion for summary judgment dismissing the complaint is denied.

In this action by a provider to recover assigned first-party no-fault benefits, plaintiff appeals from an order of the Civil Court which granted defendant's motion for summary judgment dismissing the complaint on the ground that plaintiff's assignor had failed to appear for duly scheduled independent medical examinations.

For the reasons stated in Harvard Med., P.C., as Assignee of Abubakarr Jalloh v Maya Assur. Co. (___ Misc 3d ___, 2016 NY Slip Op ___ [appeal No. 2014-335 Q C], decided herewith), the order is reversed and defendant's motion for summary judgment dismissing the complaint is denied.

Pesce, P.J., Aliotta and Solomon, JJ., concur.


Decision Date: October 13, 2016

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.