Longevity Med. Supply, Inc. v Allstate Ins. Co.

Annotate this Case
[*1] Longevity Med. Supply, Inc. v Allstate Ins. Co. 2015 NY Slip Op 50757(U) Decided on May 6, 2015 Appellate Term, Second Department Published by New York State Law Reporting Bureau pursuant to Judiciary Law ยง 431. This opinion is uncorrected and will not be published in the printed Official Reports.

Decided on May 6, 2015
SUPREME COURT, APPELLATE TERM, SECOND DEPARTMENT, 2d, 11th and 13th JUDICIAL DISTRICTS
PRESENT: : PESCE, P.J., SOLOMON and ELLIOT, JJ.
2013-2435 K C

Longevity Medical Supply, Inc. as Assignee of ANA CABRAL, Appellant,

against

Allstate Insurance Company, Respondent.

Appeal from an order of the Civil Court of the City of New York, Kings County (Wavny Toussaint, J.), entered September 5, 2013. The order, insofar as appealed from and as limited by the brief, denied plaintiff's motion for summary judgment.

ORDERED that the order, insofar as appealed from, is affirmed, with $25 costs.

In this action by a provider to recover assigned first-party no-fault benefits, plaintiff appeals, as limited by its brief, from so much of an order as denied its motion for summary judgment. The Civil Court determined that defendant had established that it had timely mailed requests for additional verification, and found that the only issue for trial is whether plaintiff had served responses to defendant's verification requests.

The record shows that the Civil Court considered both defendant's proof that defendant had not received requested verification from plaintiff and an affidavit from plaintiff which asserts that material responsive to the verification requests had been sent to defendant. Thus, plaintiff failed to establish the absence of a material issue of fact. As a result, the Civil Court properly determined that plaintiff was not entitled to summary judgment. Plaintiff's remaining contentions lack merit.

Accordingly, the order, insofar as appealed from, is affirmed.

Pesce, P.J., Solomon and Elliot, JJ., concur.


Decision Date: May 06, 2015

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.