People v Clare (Daniel)

[*1] People v Clare (Daniel) 2006 NY Slip Op 51859(U) [13 Misc 3d 131(A)] Decided on September 25, 2006 Appellate Term, Second Department Published by New York State Law Reporting Bureau pursuant to Judiciary Law § 431. This opinion is uncorrected and will not be published in the printed Official Reports.

Decided on September 25, 2006
SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK
APPELLATE TERM: 9th and 10th JUDICIAL DISTRICTS
PRESENT: : RUDOLPH, P.J., ANGIOLILLO and LIPPMAN, JJ
2004-1435 D CR.

THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK, Respondent,

against

Daniel M. Clare, Appellant.

Appeal by defendant from a judgment of the Justice Court of the Town of LaGrange, Dutchess County (Joseph Speigel, J.), rendered August 3, 2004, deemed an appeal from an amended judgment of the same court rendered September 7, 2004 (see CPL 460.10 [6]). The amended judgment convicted defendant, upon his plea of guilty, of sexual abuse in the second degree.

Amended judgment of conviction affirmed.

We have reviewed the record and agree with defendant's assigned counsel that there are no nonfrivolous issues which could be raised on appeal. Counsel is granted leave to withdraw as counsel (see Anders v California, 386 US 738 [1967]; People v Paige, 54 AD2d 631 [1976]).

Rudolph, P.J., Angiolillo and Lippman, JJ., concur.
Decision Date: September 25, 2006