Scally v La Vista

Annotate this Case
[*1] Scally v La Vista 2005 NY Slip Op 51934(U) [10 Misc 3d 129(A)] Decided on November 22, 2005 Appellate Term, Second Department Published by New York State Law Reporting Bureau pursuant to Judiciary Law § 431. This opinion is uncorrected and will not be published in the printed Official Reports.

Decided on November 22, 2005
SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK
APPELLATE TERM: 9th and 10th JUDICIAL DISTRICTS
PRESENT: November 22, 2005 SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK APPELLATE TERM : 9th and 10th JUDICIAL DISTRICTS PRESENT : RUDOLPH, P.J., ANGIOLILLO and TANENBAUM, JJ.
2005-460 P C

Vera L. Scally, Respondent,

against

Virginia La Vista, Appellant.

Appeal from a judgment of the Justice Court of the Town of Carmel, Putnam County (Joseph J. Spofford, Jr., J.), entered November 22, 2004. The judgment, after a nonjury trial, awarded plaintiff the sum of $2,350.


Judgment unanimously affirmed without costs.

Plaintiff instituted this small claims action for breach of an oral agreement to complete repairs to a mobile home purchased from defendant. Although defendant provided plaintiff with a bill of sale stating that the mobile home was delivered "as is," it failed to contain all the terms of the agreement and was not signed by plaintiff. As a [*2]
result, parol evidence was admissible to present plaintiff's version of the facts, which refuted the terms set forth in the "bill of sale" (see Prince, Richardson on Evidence § 11-106 [Farrell 11th ed]). In view of the foregoing, substantial justice was done between the parties according to the rules and principles of substantive law (UJCA 1807).
Decision Date: November 22, 2005

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.