Vega v Carlino

Annotate this Case
[*1] Vega v Carlino 2005 NYSlipOp 51308(U) Decided on August 11, 2005 Appellate Term, Second Department Published by New York State Law Reporting Bureau pursuant to Judiciary Law ยง 431. This opinion is uncorrected and will not be published in the printed Official Reports.

Decided on August 11, 2005
SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK
APPELLATE TERM: 2nd and 11th JUDICIAL DISTRICTS
PRESENT: August 11, 2005 SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK APPELLATE TERM : 2nd and 11th JUDICIAL DISTRICTS PRESENT : PESCE, P.J., PATTERSON and RIOS, JJ.
2004-614 Q C

Frank Vega, Jr., Appellant,

against

Francesco Carlino and Florrie Carlino, Respondents.

Appeal by plaintiff from a small claims judgment of the Civil Court, Queens County (B. Siegal, J.), entered on October 14, 2003, which dismissed his action.


Judgment unanimously affirmed without costs.

In this small claims action to recover unpaid rent, we find that substantial justice was done between the parties according to the rules and principles of substantive law (UCCA 1804, 1807; see Ross v Friedman, 269 AD2d 584 [2000]; Williams v Roper, 269 AD2d 125, 126 [2000]).
Decision Date: August 11, 2005

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.