People v Sessions (Gary)

Annotate this Case
[*1] People v Sessions (Gary) 2005 NYSlipOp 50867(U) Decided on June 7, 2005 Appellate Term, Second Department Published by New York State Law Reporting Bureau pursuant to Judiciary Law § 431. This opinion is uncorrected and will not be published in the printed Official Reports.

Decided on June 7, 2005
SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK
APPELLATE TERM: 2nd and 11th JUDICIAL DISTRICTS
PRESENT: PESCE, P.J., PATTERSON and BELEN, JJ.
2002-1606 K CR

THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK, Respondent,

against

Gary Sessions, Appellant.

Appeal by defendant from a judgment of the Criminal Court, Kings County (D. Chun, J.), rendered September 26, 2002, convicting defendant, upon his guilty plea, of endangering the welfare of a child (Penal Law § 260.10 [1]) and imposing sentence.


Judgment of conviction unanimously affirmed.

As defendant received the sentence for which he bargained, he has no ground to complain that said sentence was excessive (e.g. People v Domin, 13 AD3d 391 [2004]; People v Fanelli, 8 AD3d 296 [2004]; People v Kazepis, 101 AD2d 816 [1984]). In any event, the sentence did not constitute an abuse of sentencing discretion, nor should the sentence be modified in the interest of justice. In our view, defendant's prior conviction of a more serious offense of a similar nature and the salutatory conditions of his probation render the instant sentence entirely appropriate (People v Suitte, 90 AD2d 80 [1982]).
Decision Date: June 07, 2005

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.