Riverview Indus., Inc. v Aigaje

Annotate this Case
[*1] Riverview Indus., Inc. v Aigaje 2005 NYSlipOp 50852(U) Decided on May 31, 2005 Appellate Term, Second Department Published by New York State Law Reporting Bureau pursuant to Judiciary Law ยง 431. This opinion is uncorrected and will not be published in the printed Official Reports.

Decided on May 31, 2005
SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK
APPELLATE TERM: 9th and 10th JUDICIAL DISTRICTS
PRESENT: RUDOLPH, P.J., ANGIOLILLO and COVELLO, JJ.
2004-1503 W C

Riverview Industries, Inc., Respondent,

against

Segundo Aigaje, Appellant.

Appeal by defendant from a commercial claims judgment of the Peekskill City Court, Westchester County (W. Maher, J.), entered on May 24, 2004, which awarded plaintiff the principal sum of $996.


Judgment unanimously reversed without costs and matter remanded to the court below for a new trial.

Plaintiff sued its former employee for failure to repay a loan for legal fees, and for telephone calls and the cost of a uniform. It was error for the court to render a judgment where, as here, the record indicates that the plaintiff's president was not sworn in prior to presenting plaintiff's case (Riley v Sharon's Westbrook Inn, 2 Misc 3d
128[A], 2003 NY Slip Op 51696[U] [App Term, 9th & 10th Jud Dists]). Consequently, substantial justice was not done between the parties according to the rules and principles of substantive law (UCCA 1807-A) and a new trial is required. We note that at the new trial, defendant should be afforded an opportunity to present evidence in support of his counterclaim.
Decision Date: May 31, 2005

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.