Metro Med. Diagnostics, P.C. v Motor Veh. Acc. Indem. Corp.

Annotate this Case
[*1] Metro Med. Diagnostics, P.C. v Motor Veh. Acc. Indem. Corp. 2005 NY Slip Op 50238(U) Decided on March 1, 2005 Appellate Term, Second Department Published by New York State Law Reporting Bureau pursuant to Judiciary Law ยง 431. This opinion is uncorrected and will not be published in the printed Official Reports.

Decided on March 1, 2005
SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK
APPELLATE TERM: 2nd and 11th JUDICIAL DISTRICTS
PRESENT: March 1, 2005 SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK APPELLATE TERM : 2nd and 11th JUDICIAL DISTRICTS PRESENT : PESCE, P.J., PATTERSON and GOLIA, JJ.
2004-1019 Q C

METRO MEDICAL DIAGNOSTICS, PC Assignee of HELEN ROBINSON, JACKLINE WILLIAMS, and JASON HARRICHARAN, Respondent,

against

MOTOR VEHICLE ACCIDENT INDEMNITY CORPORATION, Appellant.

Appeal by defendant from an order of the Civil Court, Queens County (H. Lane, J.), entered May 24, 2004, denying its motion to sever.


Order unanimously reversed without costs and defendant's motion to sever granted.

Plaintiff commenced this action to recover no-fault benefits as assignee of three assignors. The claims arose out of three separate accidents. Defendant moved to sever the six causes of action in the complaint into three separate actions pursuant to CPLR 603, which motion the court below denied by order entered May 24, 2004.
In light of the recent trend in cases involving the severance of no-fault causes of action under similar circumstances, we find that the particular facts herein relating to each claim are likely to raise few, if any, common issues of law or fact, even if the assignors' insurance policies are identical (see Radiology Resource Network, PC v Fireman's Fund Ins. Co., 12 AD3d 185 [2004]). Defendant's answer clearly places at issue, inter alia, the necessity and reasonableness of the rendered medical services and the sufficiency of the no-fault forms that have been submitted. We note that the lower court's decision was rendered prior to the Appellate Division's decision in Radiology Resource Network, PC (id.). [*2]
Decision Date: March 01, 2005

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.