Angelis v Germans

Annotate this Case
[*1] Angelis v Germans 2005 NY Slip Op 50182(U) Decided on February 17, 2005 Appellate Term, Second Department Published by New York State Law Reporting Bureau pursuant to Judiciary Law ยง 431. This opinion is uncorrected and will not be published in the printed Official Reports.

Decided on February 17, 2005
SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK
APPELLATE TERM: 9th and 10th JUDICIAL DISTRICTS
PRESENT: McCABE, P.J., COVELLO and TANENBAUM, JJ.
2004-970 S C

George Angelis, Respondent,

against

Theodorus Germans, Appellant.

Appeal by defendant from an order of the Small Claims Part of the District Court, Suffolk County (J. Flanagan, J.), dated June 2, 2004, which denied his motion


to vacate a default judgment.

Order unanimously affirmed without costs.

In this small claims action to recover commissions, the court below did not improvidently exercise its discretion by denying defendant's motion to vacate the
default judgment (see CPLR 5015 [a] [1]; Alliance Prop. Mgt. & Dev. v Andrews Ave. Equities, 70 NY2d 831 [1987]; Barasch v Micucci, 49 NY2d 594 [1980]; Martinez v Otis El. Co., 213 AD2d 523 [1995]; Tandy Computer Leasing v Video X Home Lib., 124 AD2d 530 [1986]). Accordingly, the trial court provided the parties with substantial
justice according to the rules and principles of substantive law (UDCA 1804, 1807; see Ross v Friedman, 269 AD2d 584 [2000]; Williams v Roper, 269 AD2d 125, 126 [2000]). [*2]
Decision Date: February 17, 2005

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.