JJ & R Chiropractic PC v MVAIC

Annotate this Case
[*1] JJ & R Chiropractic PC v MVAIC 2019 NY Slip Op 51559(U) Decided on October 4, 2019 Appellate Term, First Department Published by New York State Law Reporting Bureau pursuant to Judiciary Law ยง 431. This opinion is uncorrected and will not be published in the printed Official Reports.

Decided on October 4, 2019
SUPREME COURT, APPELLATE TERM, FIRST DEPARTMENT
PRESENT: Shulman, P.J., Cooper, Edmead, JJ.
570024/19

JJ & R Chiropractic PC, a/a/o Eugenie Revange, Plaintiff-Respondent,

against

MVAIC, Defendant-Appellant.

Defendant appeals from an order of the Civil Court of the City of New York, New York County (Mary V. Rosado, J.), entered April 18, 2018, which denied its motion for summary judgment dismissing the complaint.

Per Curiam.

Order (Mary V. Rosado, J.), entered April 18, 2018, affirmed, with $10 costs.

This action, seeking recovery of no-fault first-party benefits, is not ripe for summary dismissal, since defendant MVAIC failed in its burden to establish, prima facie, that plaintiff's assignor was not a "qualified person" entitled to no-fault coverage (see Socrates Med. Health, P.C. v MVAIC, 29 Misc 3d 129[A], 2010 NY Slip Op 51780[U] [App Term, 1st Dept 2010]). Nor has defendant established that plaintiff was required to "exhaust its remedies" against the vehicle's owner prior to commencing this action (see Omega Diagnostic Imaging, P.C. v MVAIC, 30 Misc 3d 145[A], 2011 NY Slip Op 50432[U] [App Term, 1st Dept 2011]; Omega Diagnostic Imaging, P.C. v MVAIC, 29 Misc 3d 129[A], 2010 NY Slip Op 51779[U] [App Term, 1st Dept 2010]).

THIS CONSTITUTES THE DECISION AND ORDER OF THE COURT.


I concur I concur I concur
Decision Date: October 04, 2019

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.