53-63 Partners, L.P. v Paez

Annotate this Case
[*1] 53-63 Partners, L.P. v Paez 2019 NY Slip Op 50851(U) Decided on May 31, 2019 Appellate Term, First Department Published by New York State Law Reporting Bureau pursuant to Judiciary Law ยง 431. This opinion is uncorrected and will not be published in the printed Official Reports.

Decided on May 31, 2019
SUPREME COURT, APPELLATE TERM, FIRST DEPARTMENT
PRESENT: Shulman, P.J., Gonzalez, Edmead, JJ.
570089/19

53-63 Partners, L.P., -Appellant,

against

Regina Paez, Respondent-Tenant-Respondent, and "John Doe" and "Jane Doe," Respondents-Undertenants.

Landlord appeals from an order of the Civil Court of the City of New York, New York County (Heela D. Capell, J.), dated May 18, 2018, which granted tenant's motion for summary judgment dismissing the petition in a holdover summary proceeding.

Per Curiam.

Order (Heela D. Capell, J.), dated May 18, 2018, affirmed, with $10 costs.

This holdover proceeding, premised upon allegations that the rent stabilized tenant breached her lease by failing to maintain her section 8 benefits (see generally Rosario v Diagonal Realty, LLC, 8 NY3d 755 [2007], cert denied 552 US 1141 [2008]), was properly dismissed on tenant's motion. The documentary evidence establishes that tenant's section 8 subsidy was subsequently reinstated. In the circumstances, we agree that the eviction remedy sought by landlord does not lie (see DU 1st Realty Co. LP v Robinson, 35 Misc 3d 138[A], 2012 NY Slip Op 50840[U] [App Term, 1st Dept 2012]).

THIS CONSTITUTES THE DECISION AND ORDER OF THE COURT.


I concur I concur I concur
Decision Date: May 31, 2019

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.