People v Prandy (Carlos)

Annotate this Case
[*1] People v Prandy (Carlos) 2019 NY Slip Op 50717(U) Decided on May 14, 2019 Appellate Term, First Department Published by New York State Law Reporting Bureau pursuant to Judiciary Law § 431. This opinion is uncorrected and will not be published in the printed Official Reports.

Decided on May 14, 2019
SUPREME COURT, APPELLATE TERM, FIRST DEPARTMENT
PRESENT: Shulman, P.J., Gonzalez, Edmead, JJ.
570815/17

The People of the State of New York, Respondent,

against

Carlos M. Binett Prandy, Defendant-Appellant.

Defendant appeals from a judgment of the Criminal Court of the City of New York, New York County (Barbara F. Newman, J.H.O.), rendered December 13, 2017, convicting him, upon a plea of guilty, of violating New York Public Health Law § 229, and imposing sentence.

Per Curiam.

Judgment of conviction (Barbara F. Newman, J.H.O.), dated December 13, 2017, reversed, on the law, accusatory instrument dismissed and fine, if paid, remitted.

The terse plea colloquy fails to establish that defendant understood the nature of the offense to which he was pleading, and that his plea was knowing, intelligent and voluntary. Given the relatively minor nature of the infraction here charged, we dismiss the accusatory instrument in lieu of remanding the matter (see People v Burwell, 53 NY2d 849, 851 [1981]).

We note the absence of a respondent's brief.

THIS CONSTITUTES THE DECISION AND ORDER OF THE COURT.


I concur I concur I concur
Decision Date: May 14, 2019

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.