People v Bah (Rafael)

Annotate this Case
[*1] People v Bah (Rafael) 2019 NY Slip Op 50335(U) Decided on March 20, 2019 Appellate Term, First Department Published by New York State Law Reporting Bureau pursuant to Judiciary Law § 431. This opinion is uncorrected and will not be published in the printed Official Reports.

Decided on March 20, 2019
SUPREME COURT, APPELLATE TERM, FIRST DEPARTMENT
PRESENT: Shulman, P.J., Ling-Cohan, Edmead, JJ.
570295/16

The People of the State of New York, Respondent,

against

Rafael Bah, Defendant-Appellant.

Defendant appeals from a judgment of the Criminal Court of the City of New York, New York County (Laurie Peterson, J.), rendered January 13, 2016, convicting him, upon a plea of guilty, of aggravated harassment in the second degree, and imposing sentence.

Per Curiam.

Judgment of conviction (Laurie Peterson, J.), rendered January 13, 2016, affirmed.

The misdemeanor complaint was jurisdictionally valid, since it described facts of an evidentiary nature establishing reasonable cause to believe that defendant was guilty of aggravated harassment in the second degree (see Penal Law § 240.30[3]; see also People v Dumay, 23 NY3d 518, 522 [2014]). Allegations that at a specified date, time and location, defendant approached two named individuals and stated "America doesn't approve of homosexuals like you, I choked people like you to death in Afghanistan, if we were outside, I'd beat the shit out of you," while defendant repeatedly pointed his finger in said individuals' faces and stood directly in front of them, were sufficient at the pleading stage to support a finding that defendant made a "genuine threat [to] physical[ly] harm" the victims (People v Dietze, 75 NY2d 47, 54 [1989]) and placed them in reasonable fear of harmful physical contact (see People v Thomas, 58 AD3d 445, 446 [2009], lv denied 12 NY3d 788 [2009]; People v Green, 41 Misc 3d 134[A], 2013 NY Slip Op 51863[U] [App Term, 1st Dept 2013], lv denied 22 NY3d 1139 [2014]), based on defendant's perception of their sexual orientation (see Penal Law § 240.30[3]).

THIS CONSTITUTES THE DECISION AND ORDER OF THE COURT.


I concur I concur I concur
Decision Date: March 20, 2019

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.