People v Douce (Oliver)

Annotate this Case
[*1] People v Douce (Oliver) 2019 NY Slip Op 50108(U) Decided on January 25, 2019 Appellate Term, First Department Published by New York State Law Reporting Bureau pursuant to Judiciary Law ยง 431. This opinion is uncorrected and will not be published in the printed Official Reports.

Decided on January 25, 2019
SUPREME COURT, APPELLATE TERM, FIRST DEPARTMENT
PRESENT: Shulman, P.J, Ling-Cohan, Edmead, JJ.
570267/17

The People of the State of New York, Respondent,

against

Oliver Douce, Defendant-Appellant.

Defendant appeals from a judgment of the Criminal Court of the City of New York, New York County (Laurie Peterson, J.), rendered March 30, 2017, after a nonjury trial, convicting him of unlicensed driving, and imposing sentence.

Per Curiam.

Judgment of conviction (Laurie Peterson, J.), rendered March 30, 2017, affirmed.

Criminal Court properly denied defendant's requests to proceed pro se. Defendant was unable to knowingly, voluntarily and intelligently waive his right to counsel, since he refused to recognize the court's jurisdiction over him, or the authority of the prosecutor and his counsel to prosecute and defend the case; was unwilling to engage with the trial court or answer rudimentary questions concerning his education, experience and background; and displayed an overall pattern of conduct that prevented the fair and orderly exposition of the issues (see People v Crespo, 32 NY3d 176 [2018]; People v Gregory, 163 AD3d 847, 848-849 [2018]; People v Diaz, 294 AD2d 225 [2002], lv denied 98 NY2d 767 [2002]).

THIS CONSTITUTES THE DECISION AND ORDER OF THE COURT.


I concur I concur I concur

Decision Date: January 25, 2019

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.