People v Sarita-Sanchez (Junior)

Annotate this Case
[*1] People v Sarita-Sanchez (Junior) 2019 NY Slip Op 50034(U) Decided on January 16, 2019 Appellate Term, First Department Published by New York State Law Reporting Bureau pursuant to Judiciary Law § 431. This opinion is uncorrected and will not be published in the printed Official Reports.

Decided on January 16, 2019
SUPREME COURT, APPELLATE TERM, FIRST DEPARTMENT
PRESENT: Gonzalez, J.P., Cooper, Edmead, JJ.
570791/16

The People of the State of New York, Respondent,

against

Junior Sarita-Sanchez, Defendant-Appellant.

Defendant appeals from a judgment of the Criminal Court of the City of New York, New York County (Felicia A. Mennin, J.), rendered October 26, 2016, after a nonjury trial, convicting him of driving while impaired by alcohol, and imposing sentence.

Per Curiam.

Judgment of conviction (Felicia A. Mennin, J.), rendered October 26, 2016, affirmed.

Defendant's conviction of driving while impaired (see Vehicle and Traffic Law § 1192[1]) was supported by legally sufficient evidence and was not against the weight of the evidence. There is no basis for disturbing the court's determinations concerning credibility (see People v Danielson, 9 NY3d 342, 348-349 [2007]). The credited police testimony showed that, after being stopped for driving through a steady red light, defendant exhibited signs of intoxication - his eyes were bloodshot and glassy, his breath had a strong odor of alcohol, and he was unsteady on his feet (see People v Cruz, 48 NY2d 419, 426-427 [1979], appeal dismissed 446 US 901 [1980]).

THIS CONSTITUTES THE DECISION AND ORDER OF THE COURT.


I concur I concur I concur
Decision Date: January 16, 2019

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.