Board of Mgrs. of the Towers On the Park Condominium v Cruz

Annotate this Case
[*1] Board of Mgrs. of the Towers On the Park Condominium v Cruz 2018 NY Slip Op 50054(U) Decided on January 18, 2018 Appellate Term, First Department Published by New York State Law Reporting Bureau pursuant to Judiciary Law ยง 431. This opinion is uncorrected and will not be published in the printed Official Reports.

Decided on January 18, 2018
SUPREME COURT, APPELLATE TERM, FIRST DEPARTMENT
PRESENT: Shulman, P.J., Ling-Cohan, Gonzalez, JJ.
570398/17

Board of Managers of the Towers On the Park Condominium, Plaintiff-Respondent,

against

Josefina Cruz, Defendant-Appellant.

Defendant appeals from an order of the Civil Court of the City of New York, New York County (Lisa A. Sokoloff, J.), entered August 31, 2016, which awarded plaintiff additional attorneys' fees in the principal sum of $21,390.09.

Per Curiam.

Order (Lisa A. Sokoloff, J.), entered August 31, 2016, affirmed, without costs.

Plaintiff established its entitlement to an award of additional attorneys' fees for the time incurred in successfully defending defendant's prior appeal (see Board of Mgrs. of the Towers on the Park Condominium v Cruz, 49 Misc 3d 143[A], 2015 NY Slip Op 51641[U] [App Term, 1st Dept 2015]; see also 338 W. 46th St. Realty, LLC v Morton, 50 Misc 3d 126[a], 2015 NY Slip Op 51845[U] [App Term, 1st Dept 2015]). Viewing the evidence presented in light of all relevant factors (see Matter of Freeman, 34 NY2d 1, 9 [1974]), including the time and labor required, the difficulty of the questions involved, and the lawyer's experience, ability and reputation, we find, based upon our independent review of the record, that the fee award was reasonable under the circumstances.

We have examined defendant's remaining contentions and find them to be without merit.

THIS CONSTITUTES THE DECISION AND ORDER OF THE COURT.


I concur I concur I concur

Decision Date: January 18, 2018



Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.