People v Izidro de Souza

[*1] People v Izidro de Souza 2018 NY Slip Op 50011(U) Decided on January 8, 2018 Appellate Term, First Department Published by New York State Law Reporting Bureau pursuant to Judiciary Law § 431. This opinion is uncorrected and will not be published in the printed Official Reports.

Decided on January 8, 2018
SUPREME COURT, APPELLATE TERM, FIRST DEPARTMENT
PRESENT: Shulman, J.P., Ling-Cohan, Gonzalez, JJ.
570254/16

The People of the State of New York, Respondent,

against

Patrick Izidro de Souza, Defendant-Appellant.

Defendant appeals from a judgment of the Criminal Court of the City of New York, New York County (Richard Ross, J.H.O), rendered April 12, 2016, convicting him, upon a plea of guilty, of possessing an unleashed animal in a city park, and imposing sentence.

Per Curiam.

Judgment of conviction (Richard Ross, J.H.O), rendered April 12, 2016, reversed, on the law, accusatory instrument dismissed, fine and surcharge, if paid, remitted.

As the People concede, defendant's conviction must be vacated since the plea record lacks the requisite "affirmative showing" that defendant understood and waived his Boykin rights (see Boykin v Alabama, 395 US 238, 242 [1969]; People v Tyrell, 22 NY3d 359, 365 [2013]). The People also agree that dismissal of the accusatory instrument is the appropriate corrective action in this particular case (cf. People v Conceicao, 26 NY3d 375, 385 n 1 [2015]).

THIS CONSTITUTES THE DECISION AND ORDER OF THE COURT.

I concur I concur I concur
Decision Date: January 08, 2018