People v Medel-Dominguez (Hesiquio)

[*1] People v Medel-Dominguez (Hesiquio) 2017 NY Slip Op 51747(U) Decided on December 20, 2017 Appellate Term, First Department Published by New York State Law Reporting Bureau pursuant to Judiciary Law § 431. This opinion is uncorrected and will not be published in the printed Official Reports.

Decided on December 20, 2017
SUPREME COURT, APPELLATE TERM, FIRST DEPARTMENT
PRESENT: Lowe, III, P.J., Schoenfeld, Shulman, JJ.
570281/17

The People of the State of New York, Respondent,

against

Hesiquio Medel-Dominguez, Defendant-Appellant.

The People appeal from (1) an order of the Criminal Court of the City of New York, Bronx County (Harold Adler, J.), dated October 26, 2016, which granted defendant's motion to suppress the results of a breathalyzer test, and (2) an order (same court and Judge), dated December 19, 2016, denying the People's motion for renewal.

Per Curiam.

Orders (Harold Adler, J.), dated October 26, 2016, and December 19, 2016, affirmed.

We find no basis to disturb the suppression court's finding that the People failed to meet their burden of proof on the question of defendant's voluntary consent to the breathalyzer test (see generally People v Dobson, 285 AD2d 737, 738 [2001], lv denied 97 NY2d 658 [2001]), where the People failed to present a full translation of the video recording of the test, particularly the conversation in Spanish between defendant and the Intoxicated Driver Testing Unit officer immediately prior to the administration of the test.

The court properly exercised its discretion in denying the People's motion for renewal, since the People had a full and fair opportunity to present their evidence at the original hearing (see People v Kevin W., 22 NY3d 287 [2013]).

THIS CONSTITUTES THE DECISION AND ORDER OF THE COURT.

I concur I concur I concur

Decision Date: December 20, 2017