People v Mandel (Eric)

Annotate this Case
[*1] People v Mandel (Eric) 2017 NY Slip Op 51589(U) Decided on November 27, 2017 Appellate Term, First Department Published by New York State Law Reporting Bureau pursuant to Judiciary Law § 431. This opinion is uncorrected and will not be published in the printed Official Reports.

Decided on November 27, 2017
SUPREME COURT, APPELLATE TERM, FIRST DEPARTMENT
PRESENT: Lowe, III, P.J., Schoenfeld, Shulman, JJ.
570508/16

The People of the State of New York, Respondent,

against

Eric Mandel, Defendant-Appellant.

Defendant appeals from a judgment of the Criminal Court of the City of New York, New York County (Felicia A. Mennin, J.), rendered June 30, 2016, after a nonjury trial, convicting him of attempted criminal mischief in the fourth degree, and imposing sentence.

Per Curiam.

Judgment of conviction (Felicia A. Mennin, J.), rendered June 30, 2016, affirmed.

The verdict convicting defendant of attempted criminal mischief in the fourth degree (see Penal Law §§ 110.00; 145.00[1]) was supported by legally sufficient evidence (see People v Danielson, 9 NY3d 342, 348-349 [2007]). There is no basis for disturbing the trial court's determinations concerning credibility. The evidence established that defendant, without permission, struck the windshield of complainant's car with his fist following a minor traffic incident, causing the windshield to shatter. Defendant's requisite intent to damage the property is fairly inferred from his acts and the surrounding circumstances (see People v Gordon, 23 NY3d 643, 650 [2014]; Matter of Carlos M., 32 AD3d 686, 687 [2006]).

THIS CONSTITUTES THE DECISION AND ORDER OF THE COURT.


I concur I concur I concur
Decision Date: November 27, 2017

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.