People v McDuffie (Courtney)

Annotate this Case
[*1] People v McDuffie (Courtney) 2017 NY Slip Op 51326(U) Decided on October 5, 2017 Appellate Term, First Department Published by New York State Law Reporting Bureau pursuant to Judiciary Law § 431. This opinion is uncorrected and will not be published in the printed Official Reports.

Decided on October 5, 2017
SUPREME COURT, APPELLATE TERM, FIRST DEPARTMENT
PRESENT: Lowe, III, P.J., Shulman, Gonzalez, J.
570837/14

The People of the State of New York, Respondent,

against

Courtney McDuffie, Defendant-Appellant.

In consolidated appeals, defendant appeals from two judgments of the Criminal Court of the City of New York, New York County (Robert M. Mandelbaum, J.), each rendered July 3, 2014, convicting him, upon his pleas of guilty, of two counts of disorderly conduct, and imposing sentence.

Per Curiam.

Judgments of conviction (Robert M. Mandelbaum, J.), rendered July 3, 2014, reversed, on the law, and accusatory instruments dismissed.

As the People essentially concede, the accusatory instruments charging defendant with fraudulent accosting (see Penal Law § 165.30[1]) were jurisdictionally defective, since they failed to set forth the basis for the police officers' respective conclusions that the sports teams for which defendant was seeking donations did not exist (see generally People v Jackson, 18 NY3d 738, 746 [2012]). However, in the particular circumstances at issue and as the People request, the dismissal is without prejudice to reprosecution of the underlying offenses under new accusatory instruments (see CPL 470.20; People v Jalloh, 54 Misc 3d 130[A], 2017 NY Slip Op 50019[U] [App Term, 1st Dept 2017]; see also People v Nuccio, 78 NY2d 102, 104 [1991]).

THIS CONSTITUTES THE DECISION AND ORDER OF THE COURT.


I concur I concur I concur
Decision Date: October 05, 2017

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.