Samoroukov v Kamenev

Annotate this Case
[*1] Samoroukov v Kamenev 2017 NY Slip Op 50473(U) Decided on April 14, 2017 Appellate Term, First Department Published by New York State Law Reporting Bureau pursuant to Judiciary Law § 431. This opinion is uncorrected and will not be published in the printed Official Reports.

Decided on April 14, 2017
SUPREME COURT, APPELLATE TERM, FIRST DEPARTMENT
PRESENT: Lowe, III, P.J., Ling-Cohan, Gonzalez, JJ.
570710/16

Kirill Samoroukov, Plaintiff-Appellant,

against

Vladimir Kamenev, Defendant-Respondent.

Plaintiff appeals from an order of the Civil Court of the City of New York, New York County (Paul A. Goetz, J.), entered March 1, 2016, which denied his motion for an award of costs and disbursements.

Per Curiam.

Order (Paul A. Goetz, J.), entered March 1, 2016, affirmed, without costs.

We find no abuse of discretion in the denial of statutory costs to plaintiff, where both the complaint and the counterclaims were dismissed (see CPLR 8101; Michaels v Cooper, 245 AD2d 1103 [1997]; Raab v Dumblewski, 226 AD2d 1021, 1024 [1996]; see also 14 Weinstein—Korn—Miller, NY Civ Prac ¶ 8101.15 [2nd ed]). Nor is plaintiff entitled to disbursements (see CPLR 8301[a], [c]).

THIS CONSTITUTES THE DECISION AND ORDER OF THE COURT.


I concur I concur I concur
Decision Date: April 14, 2017

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.